Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Seroprevalence and Reported Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cases in US Children, August 2020–May 2021
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Background
Case-based surveillance of pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases underestimates the prevalence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections among children and adolescents. Our objectives were to estimate monthly SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence and calculate ratios of SARS-CoV-2 infections to reported COVID-19 cases among children and adolescents in 8 US states.
Methods
Using data from the Nationwide Commercial Laboratory Seroprevalence Survey, we estimated monthly SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence among children aged 0–17 years from August 2020 through May 2021. We calculated and compared cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection extrapolated from population-standardized seroprevalence of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, cumulative COVID-19 case reports since March 2020, and infection-to-case ratios among persons of all ages and children aged 0–17 years for each state.
Results
Of 41 583 residual serum specimens tested, children aged 0–4, 5–11, and 12–17 years accounted for 1619 (3.9%), 10 507 (25.3%), and 29 457 (70.8%), respectively. Median SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence among children increased from 8% (range, 6%–20%) in August 2020 to 37% (range, 26%–44%) in May 2021. Estimated ratios of SARS-CoV-2 infections to reported COVID-19 cases in May 2021 ranged by state from 4.7–8.9 among children and adolescents to 2.2–3.9 for all ages combined.
Conclusions
Through May 2021 in selected states, the majority of children with serum specimens included in serosurveys did not have evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Case-based surveillance underestimated the number of children infected with SARS-CoV-2 more than among all ages. Continued monitoring of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 antibody seroprevalence should inform prevention and vaccination strategies.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.26.21263756: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources 1, 2 In brief, CDC partnered with three commercial laboratories to test a random sample of residual sera submitted for routine clinical testing for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using one of three commercial assays authorized under EUA: Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Assay (N protein; Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and ARCHITECT™ SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay (N protein; Abbott, Chicago, IL), both targeting the viral N protein, and VITROS® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay (spike (S) protein; Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.26.21263756: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources 1, 2 In brief, CDC partnered with three commercial laboratories to test a random sample of residual sera submitted for routine clinical testing for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using one of three commercial assays authorized under EUA: Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Assay (N protein; Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and ARCHITECT™ SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay (N protein; Abbott, Chicago, IL), both targeting the viral N protein, and VITROS® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay (spike (S) protein; Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) targeting the viral spike protein. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgGsuggested: NoneFrom February to May 2021, when COVID-19 vaccination was becoming more widely available, all serum specimens from states included in this analysis were tested for either pan-immunoglobulin (Ig) (Roche Elecsys) or IgG-specific (Abbott ARCHITECT) anti-nucleocapsid antibodies. either pan-immunoglobulin (Ig) (Roche Elecsys)suggested: Noneanti-nucleocapsidsuggested: NoneSoftware and Algorithms Sentences Resources 1, 2 In brief, CDC partnered with three commercial laboratories to test a random sample of residual sera submitted for routine clinical testing for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using one of three commercial assays authorized under EUA: Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Assay (N protein; Roche, Indianapolis, IN) and ARCHITECT™ SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay (N protein; Abbott, Chicago, IL), both targeting the viral N protein, and VITROS® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Assay (spike (S) protein; Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) targeting the viral spike protein. Abbottsuggested: (Abbott, RRID:SCR_010477)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-