Nucleocapsid Antigenemia Is a Marker of Acute SARS-CoV-2 Infection
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection is essential for diagnosis, treatment, and infection control. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fails to distinguish acute from resolved infections, as RNA is frequently detected after infectiousness. We hypothesized that nucleocapsid in blood marks acute infection with the potential to enhance isolation and treatment strategies. In a retrospective serosurvey of inpatient and outpatient encounters, we categorized samples along an infection timeline using timing of SARS-CoV-2 testing and symptomatology. Among 1860 specimens from 1607 patients, the highest levels and frequency of antigenemia were observed in samples from acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antigenemia was higher in seronegative individuals and in those with severe disease. In our analysis, antigenemia exhibited 85.8% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity as a biomarker for acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Thus, antigenemia sensitively and specifically marks acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further study is warranted to determine whether antigenemia may aid individualized assessment of active COVID-19.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.23.22269354: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: This study was approved and granted complete HIPAA and consent waiver by the Emory University Institutional Review Board (STUDY00000510). Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding The entire medical record was available during this stage, but the reviewer was blinded to antigenemia status which was not considered in labeling of COVID-19 status or category assignment. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Serological Testing: In-house developed single-dilution serological screening assays for SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid antibodies were used to establish serological status at the time of … SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.23.22269354: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: This study was approved and granted complete HIPAA and consent waiver by the Emory University Institutional Review Board (STUDY00000510). Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding The entire medical record was available during this stage, but the reviewer was blinded to antigenemia status which was not considered in labeling of COVID-19 status or category assignment. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Serological Testing: In-house developed single-dilution serological screening assays for SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and nucleocapsid antibodies were used to establish serological status at the time of antigenemia testing. SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD)suggested: Noneantigenemia testing.suggested: NoneSoftware and Algorithms Sentences Resources The Emory Healthcare Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) was queried for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT), clinical notes, ICD-10 codes, laboratory values, mechanical ventilation, and date of death. Emory Healthcaresuggested: (One Mind Biospecimen Bank Listing, RRID:SCR_004193)Data analysis: Data obtained during specimen collection were stored in Microsoft Excel. Microsoft Excelsuggested: (Microsoft Excel, RRID:SCR_016137)All data were then imported into MATLAB (The MathWorks, Inc.) for analysis. MATLABsuggested: (MATLAB, RRID:SCR_001622)Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Recognizing these limitations, we performed a post-hoc investigation of outlier cases, which facilitated hypothesis generation regarding reasons for prolonged antigenemia such as reduced renal function, prolonged critical illness, and immune compromise (Supplementary Tables 1-5 & 7). Several studies have demonstrated high specificity of antigenemia by evaluation of pre-pandemic samples [15, 17, 20], suggesting many false positives in our study are likely to have active infection beyond the parameters for acute infection defined in our reference standard schema. This will be further clarified as more robust comparisons to viral culture, sgRNA, RT-PCR Ct value, and respiratory antigen testing can be achieved. Together our data demonstrate that nucleocapsid antigenemia is a sensitive and specific biomarker of acute COVID-19 wherein COVID-19 status is defined by time since earliest positive testing and symptom onset. We conclude that nucleocapsid antigenemia is a promising candidate biomarker for active viral replication – the definition of which is the presence of replication-competent virus in a host – recognizing that the available evidence points to this being an individualized process that cannot be broadly defined based on a timeline. Further prospective studies with rigorous documentation of clinical course and correlation with viral culture and other potential biomarkers of viral replication are needed.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-