SARS-CoV-2 Virus Dynamics in Recently Infected People—Data From a Household Transmission Study

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

We used daily real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results from 67 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a household transmission study, conducted April 2020–May 2021, to examine the trajectory of cycle threshold (Ct) values, an inverse correlate of viral RNA concentration. Ct values varied across RT-PCR platforms and by participant age. Specimens collected from children and adolescents had higher Ct values and adults aged ≥50 years showed lower Ct values than adults aged 18–49 years. Ct values were lower on days when participants reported experiencing symptoms, with the lowest Ct value occurring 2–6 days after symptom onset.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.17.22272516: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Wells were seeded with Vero E6-TMPRSS2 cells, to which 100μl of participant specimen was added.
    Vero E6-TMPRSS2
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    All specimens were tested by RT-PCR using either the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel (EUA CDC-006-00019; with N1 and N2 gene targets and RNase P control; CDC assay) or the ThermoFisher TaqPath™ COVID-19 ComboKit (with S and N gene and ORF1ab targets and MS2 spike control; ThermoFisher assay).
    ThermoFisher TaqPath™
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Sample size and study period are also limitations, especially in our ability to assess the impact of vaccination status or dissociate vaccination or other demographics from age. Ct values also cannot be converted to a quantitative representation of viral load, and cannot be used to directly infer differences in infectiousness. However, despite these limitations, clinical interpretation of Ct values (or their trajectories) may be “tempting “ (IDSA and AMP joint statement on the use of SARS-CoV-2 PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values for clinical decision-making, page 3) [14]. The present data are directly relevant to these interpretations. Specifically, specimens that were collected within 4 days of symptom onset may represent periods when Ct values are still declining. These findings contribute to our understanding of RT-PCR Ct values during SARS-CoV-2 infections over a broad range of ages, in a community setting with mostly mildly symptomatic illness, and among individuals with a known date of first shedding. While these data were collected prior to Delta and Omicron circulation, and prior to widespread vaccination, they may provide context for interpreting trajectories in Ct values in similar populations during later SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.