Vaccine Effectiveness of CanSino (Adv5-nCoV) Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine Among Childcare Workers—Mexico, March–December 2021

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Background

Beginning in March 2021, Mexico vaccinated childcare workers with a single-dose CanSino Biologics (Adv5-nCoV) coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Although CanSino is currently approved for use in 10 Latin American, Asian, and European countries, little information is available about its vaccine effectiveness (VE).

Methods

We evaluated CanSino VE within a childcare worker cohort that included 1408 childcare facilities. Participants were followed during March–December 2021 and tested through severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen test if they developed any symptom compatible with COVID-19. Vaccination status was obtained through worker registries. VE was calculated as 100% × (1 − hazard ratio for SARS-CoV-2 infection in fully vaccinated vs unvaccinated participants), using an Andersen-Gill model adjusted for age, sex, state, and local viral circulation.

Results

The cohort included 43 925 persons who were mostly (96%) female with a median age of 32 years; 37 646 (86%) were vaccinated with CanSino. During March–December 2021, 2250 (5%) participants had laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, of whom 25 were hospitalized and 6 died. Adjusted VE was 20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%–29%) against illness, 76% (95% CI, 42%–90%) against hospitalization, and 94% (95% CI, 66%–99%) against death. VE against illness declined from 48% (95% CI, 33%–61%) after 14–60 days following full vaccination to 20% (95% CI, 9%–31%) after 61–120 days.

Conclusions

CanSino vaccine was effective at preventing COVID-19 illness and highly effective at preventing hospitalization and death. It will be useful to further evaluate duration of protection and assess the value of booster doses to prevent COVID-19 and severe outcomes.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.04.14.22273413: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    All analyses were conducted with SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute).
    SAS
    suggested: (SASqPCR, RRID:SCR_003056)
    SAS Institute
    suggested: (Statistical Analysis System, RRID:SCR_008567)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Strengths and limitations: Our evaluation demonstrated noteworthy strengths of IMSS’s worker surveillance and vaccine rollout in Mexico. We followed nearly 44,000 childcare workers during 2021 which allowed us to prospectively monitor COVID-19 illness development and ascertain subsequent hospitalization and death. High vaccine coverage (86%) among this cohort was facilitated by Mexico’s vaccination rollout through an existing universal vaccination program; assessments of previous pandemics demonstrate that countries that have existing immunization programs are more likely to rapidly benefit from pandemic vaccines than countries without such programs [32]. However, our study also had important limitations. Cohort members were predominantly female (96%) with a median age of 32 years, and findings may not be generalizable to other populations. Sparse outcomes, particularly hospitalizations and deaths, reduced the precision of vaccine effectiveness estimates. Additionally, a large proportion of workers with symptoms compatible with COVID-19 were tested through rapid antigen tests rather than through the more sensitive RT-PCR assays [33]; however, results of our sensitivity analysis indicated that estimates were comparable for overall and RT-PCR-only test results. Key data about SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 illness (including presence of symptoms, laboratory result, and vaccination status) were derived in many instances through self-report, although these were verified by off...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.