Evitar: designing anti-viral RNA therapies against future RNA viruses

  1. Dingyao Zhang
  2. Jingru Tian
  3. Yadong Wang
  4. Jun Lu

Reviewed by

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Motivation

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has highlighted the threat of emerging respiratory viruses and has exposed the lack of availability of off-the-shelf therapeutics against new RNA viruses. Previous research has established the potential that siRNAs and RNA-targeting CRISPR have in combating known RNA viruses. However, the feasibility and tools for designing anti-viral RNA therapeutics against future RNA viruses have not yet been established.

Results

We develop the Emerging-Virus-Targeting RNA (Evitar) pipeline for designing anti-viral siRNAs and CRISPR Cas13a guide RNA (gRNA) sequences. Within Evitar, we develop Greedy Algorithm with Redundancy and Similarity-weighted Greedy Algorithm with Redundancy to enhance the performance. Time simulations using known coronavirus genomes deposited as early as 10 years prior to the COVID-19 outbreak show that at least three SARS-CoV-2-targeting siRNAs are among the top 30 pre-designed siRNAs. In addition, among the top 19 pre-designed gRNAs, there are three SARS-CoV-2-targeting Cas13a gRNAs that could be predicted using information from 2011. Before-the-outbreak design is also possible against the MERS-CoV virus and the 2009-H1N1 swine flu virus. Designed siRNAs are further shown to suppress SARS-CoV-2 viral sequences using in vitro reporter assays. Our results support the utility of Evitar to pre-design anti-viral siRNAs/gRNAs against future viruses. Therefore, we propose the development of a collection consisting of roughly 30 pre-designed, safety-tested and off-the-shelf siRNA/CRISPR therapeutics that could accelerate responses to future RNA virus outbreaks.

Availability and implementation

Codes are available at GitHub (https://github.com/dingyaozhang/Evitar).

Supplementary information

Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac144
  2. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.13.250076: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Availability of the computational pipeline: The VirusSi pipeline is available as a command-line software, which has been deposited in the GitHub (https://github.com/dingyaozhang/VirusSi).
    VirusSi
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code.

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  3. Version published to 10.1101/2020.08.13.250076 on bioRxiv