A two-arm, randomized, controlled, multi-centric, open-label phase-2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Itolizumab in moderate to severe ARDS patients due to COVID-19

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.01.20239574: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementConsent: Subjects provided written informed consent prior to initiation of the study procedures.
    RandomizationStudy design: This was an open-label, two-arm, randomized, controlled, multi-centric, phase-2 study conducted in 4 designated COVID-19 hospitals in India.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableStudy subjects: Adult male or female patients above 18 years, who tested positive for virologic diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR), and who were hospitalized due to clinical worsening with oxygen saturation of ≤94% at rest in ambient air, were eligible for randomization if they had either moderate to severe ARDS or high levels of proinflammatory markers.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Major exclusion criteria included - known severe allergic reactions to monoclonal antibodies, an active tuberculosis (TB) infection/inadequately treated tuberculosis/latent tuberculosis, on oral anti-rejection or any immune-suppressive drugs in last 6 months, those who participated in other drug clinical trials using anti-IL-6 therapy.
    anti-rejection
    suggested: None
    anti-IL-6
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    All statistical analysis was performed using SAS® (version 9.4) software.
    SAS®
    suggested: (SASqPCR, RRID:SCR_003056)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    We identified a mortality benefit in the current study and interpret this cautiously considering the small sample size and usual limitations of undertaking an open label study, which has been conducted within the restrictions imposed by an ongoing pandemic [33]. We further acknowledge that the open-label design is also known to yield slightly larger estimates of effect size, to ameliorate which blinded, large clinical trials need to be conducted [34]. However, what is encouraging is that in addition to the mortality benefit, the current effort also identified favorable outcomes related to improved lung functions, biomarker profile and clinical resolution, especially with respect to respiratory/ventilatory support requirements. This constellation of clinical and laboratory findings supporting the beneficial effect of Itolizumab, which are likely to be internally valid for the given patient set, warrants deeper investigation to ensure generalizability and external validity of the results. The recent emergency use authorization accorded to Itolizumab for use in COVID-19 patients in India and Cuba, provides a window of opportunity to conduct a larger, global, phase 3 study and undertake post-marketing surveillance to explore the utility and impact of Itolizumab in COVID-19 cases with cytokine release syndrome. The role of systemic vasculitis and cytokine mediated coagulation disorders have been recognized as significant factors for multi organ failure in patients with severe COVI...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.