Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on California Farmworkers’ Mental Health and Food Security

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.18.20248518: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementConsent: All participants provided informed written consent after having the opportunity to hear the consent presented aloud in either Spanish or English.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    A limitation of the current study is that we were not able to ask farmworkers about all the potential effects of this pandemic. For example, we did not ask about what preparations were made to care for minor children and what pressure this imposed on the families. We know that 75% of the households had children under 18 years and 37% had children 5 years old or younger (some may not have been the respondent’s children). Very few schools and childcare facilities were open during the pandemic and only 8% of the children were in school or childcare. During the pandemic, parents had the additional responsibility for facilitating the education of their school-age children, for which many of the farmworkers in our study may not have had the proper educational, technological, or language skills. Affordable childcare is difficult to find in the best of times for these farmworker families.29 Anecdotal stories from the Salinas Valley community suggest that women were more likely to leave their jobs to provide the needed childcare and educational support for their children, resulting in even greater economic hardship, especially for single parents, but also in greater emotional burden for women. Another limitation of this study was that the results may not be generalizable to farmworkers across California, the United States, or in other countries. Our study was not a random sample of the farmworker population, and the National Agricultural Workers Survey (NAWS) of the Department of Labo...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.