College students’ COVID-19 vaccine beliefs and intentions: Implications for interventions

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.28.21258008: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: This study was approved by the university institutional review board.
    Consent: Of the 1427 who provided informed consent, 884 were able to enroll during the study’s timeframe.
    Sex as a biological variableRace was asked as a ‘select all that apply’ (White, Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, Some other race/write in); Latinx (yes, no); and Gender (female, male, gender nonconforming, trans male, trans female, different identity/write in).
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Participants were 86% White; 11.7% Asian/Pacific Islander; 4.2% Black/African American; 7.8% Latinx; and 65% identifying as female.
    Islander
    suggested: (Islander, RRID:SCR_007758)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.