Design and proof of concept for targeted phage-based COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a streamlined cold-free supply chain

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact. Although several vaccines have received emergency use authorization, demand has created enormous logistical challenges—including supply, access, and distribution—that justify research for alternative strategies. Phage are viruses that only infect bacteria and can be safely administered to humans. Here, as a proof-of-concept study, we demonstrate that aerosol vaccination with lung-targeted phage particles displaying short SARS-CoV-2 S protein epitopes and subcutaneous vaccination with targeted AAVP particles carrying the entire S protein gene both elicit systemic and specific immune responses in immunocompetent mice. Given their unique attributes, including sturdiness, simple-to-engineer platform, cost-effectiveness for rapid large-scale production, and stability at room temperature, these phage-based approaches may become attractive tools for COVID-19 vaccine development.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.15.435496: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIACUC: The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) from the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey approved all animal experiments.
    RandomizationLittermates were randomly assigned to experimental groups.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Following three washes with PBS and PBS containing 0.1% of Tween 20, bound antibodies were detected with an anti-mouse IgG HRP-conjugated (Jackson ImmunoResearch) at optical density (OD) at 450 nm.
    anti-mouse IgG
    suggested: None
    Commercially available polyclonal IgG anti-Spike protein antibody (Thermo Fisher, MA5-35949) or anti-fd bacteriophage antibody (Sigma Aldrich) served as positive controls.
    anti-Spike protein
    suggested: None
    anti-fd bacteriophage
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    Animals: Four-to-six-week-old Swiss Webster and BALB/c mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Sacramento, CA) and were housed in specific pathogen and opportunist free (SOPF) rooms with controlled temperature (20 ± 2°C), humidity (50 ± 10%), light cycle (light, 7:00-19:00; dark, 19:00 – 7:00), and access to food and water ad libitum at the research animal facilities of the Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey.
    BALB/c
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    P-7734T13) were added to the 5’ or 3’ ends, respectively, to the modified synthetic SARS-CoV-2 S gene to produce a 3.909 kb modified SARS-CoV-2 S gene that was subcloned into the EcoRI and SalI restriction sites of pUC57/AmpR at GeneWiz.
    GeneWiz
    suggested: (GENEWIZ, RRID:SCR_003177)
    Positive clones were verified by EcoRI restriction mapping, confirmed with overlapping sense and antisense primers by Sanger sequencing (SeqStudio, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the BigDye Terminator v.3.1 Cycle Sequencing and XTerminator Purification kits (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and analyzed using SnapGene software (GSL Biotech, San Diego, CA).
    SnapGene
    suggested: (SnapGene, RRID:SCR_015052)
    Statistical Analysis: Differences between groups were tested for statistical significance with Student’s t-test or analysis of variance (one-way or two-way ANOVA) using GraphPad Prism 8.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.