Effect of Vaccination on Transmission of SARS-CoV-2
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.11.21253275: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Not relevant to studies of previously collected data. Randomization See Baseline characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated healthcare workers and their households by month of first dose in the healthcare workers (Table 1). Blinding SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable Most healthcare workers were women (78·7%) whilst the majority of household members were male. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data
Results from LimitationRecognizer: First, the healthcare …SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.11.21253275: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Not relevant to studies of previously collected data. Randomization See Baseline characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated healthcare workers and their households by month of first dose in the healthcare workers (Table 1). Blinding SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable Most healthcare workers were women (78·7%) whilst the majority of household members were male. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data
Results from LimitationRecognizer: First, the healthcare workers in our analysis were aged between 18 and 65 years of age. We are therefore unable to evaluate the impact on vaccinating elderly or vulnerable individuals. Secondly, differences in individual behaviour concerning testing before and after vaccination could introduce bias. However, this seems an unlikely explanation for our findings since similar results were seen for hospitalisation, consistent results were obtained following the first and second dose, the differences became larger over time which is biologically plausible and the direction of effect were similar in both household members and healthcare workers.Results from TrialIdentifier: The statistical analysis was pre-specified prior to linking the outcome and vaccination data (http://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=39737, https://github.com/dmcalli2/hcw_vax).
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- The statistical analysis was pre-specified prior to linking the outcome and vaccination data (http://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=39737, https://github.com/dmcalli2/hcw_vax).
-
