COVID-19, Diabetes, and Associated Health Outcomes in China: Results from a Nationwide Survey of 10 545 Adults
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
This study examined the associations between diabetes and self-reported/familial COVID-19 infection and investigated health-related outcomes among those with diabetes during China’s nationwide quarantine. The 2020 China COVID-19 Survey was administered anonymously via social media (WeChat). It was completed by 10 545 adults in all of mainland China’s 31 provinces. The survey consisted of 74 items covering sociodemographic characteristics, preventive measures for COVID-19, lifestyle behaviors, and health-related outcomes during the period of quarantine. Regression models examined associations among study variables. Diabetes was associated with a six-fold increased risk of reporting COVID-19 infection among respondents or their family members. Among people with diabetes, individuals who rarely wore masks had double the risk of suspected COVID-19 infection compared with those who always wore masks, with an inverse J-shaped relationship between face mask wearing and suspected COVID-19 infection. People with diabetes tended to have both poor knowledge of COVID-19 and poor compliance with preventive measures, despite perceiving a high risk of personal infection (40.0% among respondents reporting diabetes and 8.0% without diabetes). Only 54–55% of these respondents claimed to consistently practice preventive measures, including wearing face masks. Almost 60% of those with diabetes experienced food or medication shortages during the quarantine period, which was much higher than those without diabetes. Importantly, respondents who experienced medication shortages reported a 63% higher COVID-19 infection rate. Diabetes was associated with an increased risk of self-reported personal and family member COVID-19 infection, which is mitigated by consistent use of face masks.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.07.20207282: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study was approved by the Xian Jiaotong University’s Institutional Review Board, and participants provided consent.
Consent: The study was approved by the Xian Jiaotong University’s Institutional Review Board, and participants provided consent.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources All analyses were performed using STATA 16.1 (College Station, TX, USA). STATAsuggested: (Stata, RRID:SCR_012763)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.10.07.20207282: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study was approved by the Xian Jiaotong University’s Institutional Review Board, and participants provided consent.
Consent: The study was approved by the Xian Jiaotong University’s Institutional Review Board, and participants provided consent.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources All analyses were performed using STATA 16.1 (College Station, TX, USA). STATAsuggested: (Stata, RRID:SCR_012763)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:However, the study also has limitations. First, the potential for self-selection bias is recognized in such surveys. However, it is somewhat reassuring that the prevalence of self-reported diabetes and other NCDs in our data is similar to other population surveys in China.28,29 Second, the sample was relatively younger than the national average. Therefore, findings may not be generalizable to the entire population. Third, the survey questionnaire did not ask participants to identify the specific type of diabetes that they had been diagnosed, though it is well documented that the vast majority of diabetes cases in China are T2DM.30 In conclusion, people with diabetes and their family members were found to have an increased risk of COVID-19 infection, and were more like to report shortages of food and medications during the national COVID-19 lockdown in China. Those with diabetes exhibited a variety of characteristics and behaviors which would be expected to increase both the risk of COVID-19 infection and poorer outcomes once infected. Our findings suggest that promoting public health education, better monitoring of health parameters, and stricter adherence to recommended preventive measures are particularly important among adults with diabetes. With the expanding COVID-19 pandemic, there is also an urgent need to implement measures to address anxiety management and provide practical guidance and emotional support to those at greater risk, in particular people with diabetes an...
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-