A panel of nanobodies recognizing conserved hidden clefts of all SARS-CoV-2 spike variants including Omicron

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

We are amid the historic coronavirus infectious disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Imbalances in the accessibility of vaccines, medicines, and diagnostics among countries, regions, and populations, and those in war crises, have been problematic. Nanobodies are small, stable, customizable, and inexpensive to produce. Herein, we present a panel of nanobodies that can detect the spike proteins of five SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) including Omicron. Here we show via ELISA, lateral flow, kinetic, flow cytometric, microscopy, and Western blotting assays that our nanobodies can quantify the spike variants. This panel of nanobodies broadly neutralizes viral infection caused by pseudotyped and authentic SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. Structural analyses show that the P86 clone targets epitopes that are conserved yet unclassified on the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and contacts the N-terminal domain (NTD). Human antibodies rarely access both regions; consequently, the clone buries hidden crevasses of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins that go undetected by conventional antibodies.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.10.25.465714: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIACUC: The KYODOKEN Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved the protocols for these studies (approval number 20200312) and monitored health conditions.
    Sex as a biological variablehalf-siblings—a 19-month-old male named “Puta” and a 19-month-old female named “Christy”—were immunized.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Blotted membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the C9 antibody or the C-terminally 6×His-tagged homodimer of nanobodies—the dilution ratios of P158, P334, and P543 were 1:5000, 1:1000, and 1:2500, respectively—in Tris-buffered saline (TBS, pH 7.4) containing 0.005% Tween 20 (TBST) and 5% skim milk.
    C9
    suggested: (LSBio (LifeSpan Cat# LS-C9-1000, RRID:AB_1276501)
    P334
    suggested: (Leinco Technologies Cat# P334, RRID:AB_2831621)
    In the case of nanobody-based blotting, after 3 washes with TBST, the membranes were incubated with 1:5000-diluted anti-His-tag antibody (MBL) in TBST containing 5% skim milk at room temperature for 1 h.
    anti-His-tag
    suggested: None
    The membranes were soaked with 1:5000-diluted HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (GE Healthcare) in TBST containing 5% skim milk for 30 min at room temperature.
    anti-rabbit
    suggested: None
    anti-mouse IgG
    suggested: None
    Anti-6×His-tagged antibody-positive fractions were gathered and concentrated via VIVAspin 6 size exclusion columns (30,000-MWCO) to reach a volume under 0.5 ml.
    Anti-6×His-tagged
    suggested: None
    After 3 washes with PBST, HRP-conjugated anti-alpaca VHH antibody (Jackson) at a dilution of 1:5000 was reacted at room temperature for 30 min.
    anti-alpaca VHH
    suggested: None
    After washing, the cells were incubated with an anti-His antibody (Abcam) on ice for 30 min and then Alexa 647-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Dako).
    anti-His
    suggested: None
    anti-rabbit IgG
    suggested: None
    After washing with PBST, an appropriately diluted anti-His-tagged antibody and anti-C9-tagged antibody in blocking buffer were added and reacted at room temperature for 1 h.
    anti-His-tagged
    suggested: (StressMarq Biosciences Cat# SPC-167, RRID:AB_2703750)
    anti-C9-tagged
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Cell culture and transfection: HEK and K562 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM: Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics (1% penicillin and streptomycin).
    K562
    suggested: None
    Pseudotyped virus production: HIV-1-based SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotyped virus was prepared as follows: LentiX-HEK293T cells were transfected using a polyethyleneimine transfection reagent (Cytiva) with plasmids encoding the C-terminally C9-tagged full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike variants (original, alpha, beta, and delta) and HIV-1 transfer vector encoding a luciferase reporter, according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
    LentiX-HEK293T
    suggested: None
    Microscopy analyses for cell staining: HEK cells were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding the C-terminally C9-tagged full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike variants using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
    HEK
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    The expression vector of the SARS-CoV-2 S2 domain (residues 744-1213) was constructed by removing an N-terminal part of the extracellular domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike (residues 31-743) and subcloned into the pcDNA3.1(+) vector.
    pcDNA3.1 ( + )
    suggested: None
    The synthesized genes were subcloned in the pMES4 vector to express N-terminal PelB signal peptide-conjugated and C-terminal 6×His-tagged nanobodies into the bacterial periplasm.
    pMES4
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_98223)
    The lentiviral vector pWPI-IRES-Bla-Ak-ACE2-TMPRSS2 was acquired from AddGene (plasmid #154983).
    pWPI-IRES-Bla-Ak-ACE2-TMPRSS2
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_154983)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    coli TG1 cells (Agilent Technologies Japan, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were transformed with the ligated plasmids under chilled conditions (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA)
    Bio-Rad Laboratories
    suggested: (Bio-Rad Laboratories, RRID:SCR_008426)
    The raw data of reads were trimmed of the adaptor sequence using cutadapt v1.1859, and low-quality reads were subsequently removed using Trimmomatic v0.3960.
    Trimmomatic
    suggested: (Trimmomatic, RRID:SCR_011848)
    The remaining paired reads were merged using fastq-join61 and then translated to the amino acid sequences using EMBOSS v6.6.0.062.
    EMBOSS
    suggested: (EMBOSS, RRID:SCR_008493)
    Finally, unique amino acid sequences in each library were counted using a custom Python script combining seqkit v0.10.163 and usearch v.1164.
    Python
    suggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)
    Cryo-EM image processing and refinement: The images were processed using RELION 3.169.
    RELION
    suggested: (RELION, RRID:SCR_016274)
    Movies were motion corrected using MotionCor270, and the contrast transfer functions (CTFs) were estimated using CTFFIND 4.171.
    CTFFIND
    suggested: (CTFFIND, RRID:SCR_016732)
    The data were imported and further processed with non-uniform refinement in cryoSPARC v3.2.072.
    cryoSPARC
    suggested: (cryoSPARC, RRID:SCR_016501)
    After the models were manually fitted into the density using UCSF Chimera v1.1573 and modified in Coot v0.8.9.274, real space refinement was performed in PHENIX v1.19.175.
    Coot
    suggested: (Coot, RRID:SCR_014222)
    PHENIX
    suggested: (Phenix, RRID:SCR_014224)
    Figures were prepared using UCSF Chimera73, ChimeraX77, and PyMOL v2.5.0 (Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY).
    PyMOL
    suggested: (PyMOL, RRID:SCR_000305)
    The program refmac582 in the ccp4 suite83 and the program Phenix-refine75 were used for structural refinement.
    ccp4
    suggested: (CCP4, RRID:SCR_007255)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.