Untuned antiviral immunity in COVID-19 revealed by temporal type I/III interferon patterns and flu comparison
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
No abstract available
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.21.20179291: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, and received approval by the Ethics Committees of the “Sotiria” General Chest Diseases Hospital, Athens, Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Briefly, raw reads were pre-processed using FastQC v. FastQCsuggested: (FastQC, RRID:SCR_014583)0.11.2 and cutadapt v.1.6, and then mapped to the human genome (GRCh38) using the TopHat version 2.0.13, Bowtie v. TopHatsuggested: (TopHat, RRID:SCR_013035)Bowtiesuggested: (Bowtie, RRID:SCR_005476)1.1.1 and … SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.21.20179291: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, and received approval by the Ethics Committees of the “Sotiria” General Chest Diseases Hospital, Athens, Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Briefly, raw reads were pre-processed using FastQC v. FastQCsuggested: (FastQC, RRID:SCR_014583)0.11.2 and cutadapt v.1.6, and then mapped to the human genome (GRCh38) using the TopHat version 2.0.13, Bowtie v. TopHatsuggested: (TopHat, RRID:SCR_013035)Bowtiesuggested: (Bowtie, RRID:SCR_005476)1.1.1 and Samtools version v.1.1. Samtoolssuggested: (SAMTOOLS, RRID:SCR_002105)The read count table was produced using HTSeq v.0.6. HTSeqsuggested: (HTSeq, RRID:SCR_005514)Following filtering of raw read counts with a threshold of 10 in at least one dataset, resulting in a total of 21880 genes, DESeq2 analysis was performed36. DESeq2suggested: (DESeq, RRID:SCR_000154)Pathway enrichment analysis was conducted using ClueGO and CluePedia plugin of Cytoscape. ClueGOsuggested: (ClueGO, RRID:SCR_005748)Cytoscapesuggested: (Cytoscape, RRID:SCR_003032)Clustering and dendrograms were performed with hclust function and ggdendro package, respectively, in R. hclustsuggested: (HCLUST, RRID:SCR_009154)Data and software availability: The raw RNAseq data have been deposited at GEO (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under BioProject accession number # PRJNA638753. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/suggested: (Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, RRID:SCR_005012)BioProjectsuggested: (NCBI BioProject, RRID:SCR_004801)Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed on GraphPad Prism software. GraphPad Prismsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Polar charts from the ggplot2 R package were used for the visualization of the differences in cytokine response patterns. ggplot2suggested: (ggplot2, RRID:SCR_014601)Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
-