Distinct antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in children and adults across the COVID-19 clinical spectrum

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.12.20151068: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Columbia University Irving Medical Center.
    Consent: Written consent was obtained from CPD subjects.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    BlindingCytopathic effect was revealed by crystal violet staining, and scored by an observer blinded to the study design and sample identity.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Peroxidase affiniPure goat anti-human IgG (H+L) antibody, anti-human IgM antibody (Jackson Immune Research, New Grove, PA)
    anti-human IgG
    suggested: None
    anti-human IgM
    suggested: None
    , or anti-human IgA antibody (Thermofisher, Waltham, MA) was subsequently added into each well and incubated for 1hr at 37°C, washed and TMB substrate (Sigma, St. Louis) was added and the reaction was stopped using 1M sulfuric acid.
    anti-human IgA
    suggested: None
    1M sulfuric acid.
    suggested: None
    Quantitation of antibody titrations in ELISA and neutralization assays: For quantitation of neutralization titers in the pseudovirus assay, RFP signal driven by the pseudovirus normalized to the GFP signal derived from the SARS-Cov-2 S protein and ACE2 transfected cells was measured at 24 and 48hr; the ratio of normalized RFP at 48 hours (RFP48) to normalized RFP at 24 hours (RFP24) was calculated.
    ACE2
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    This expression vector was transiently transfected into HEK293F cells and the spike trimer secreted in the supernatant was purified 3-5 days post transfection by metal affinity chromatography using an Ni-NTA (Qiagen) column.
    HEK293F
    suggested: None
    Initially, VSV-ΔG-RFP pseudotyped with VSV G is used to infect 293T (human kidney epithelial) cells that were co-transfected with full length codon optimized SARS-CoV-2 S-protein (Epoch Life Science, Sugar Land, TX), the viral entry receptor ACE2 (Epoch Life Science, Sugar Land, TX) and green fluorescent protein (GFP).
    293T
    suggested: NCBI_Iran Cat# C498, RRID:CVCL_0063)
    During the assay, infected, S protein-expressing HEK293T cells generate VSV-ΔG-RFP viruses that bear S protein which subsequently infects and drives RFP expression in Vero cells and undergo multiple cycles of entry and budding in the HEK293T cells due to the co-expression of S protein with ACE2.
    Vero
    suggested: None
    HEK293T
    suggested: NCBI_Iran Cat# C498, RRID:CVCL_0063)
    Live virus neutralization assay: Two-fold dilutions of plasma in 50µL of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Media (DMEM) were incubated with 200 plaque forming unit (pfu) of SARS-CoV-2 in 50µL of DMEM for 30min at 4°C. 100µL of DMEM 4%FBS containing 4×104 Vero E6 cells were added on the top of the former mix in order to have final dilution of sera from 1:50 to 1:6400 (4 wells per dilution).
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Image analysis was performed using ImageJ 36.
    ImageJ
    suggested: (ImageJ, RRID:SCR_003070)
    Heatmaps of this ratio at all titrations for all samples were generated using the Python data visualization library, seaborn41
    Python
    suggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)
    Statistical analysis: All statistical analysis was performed using Prism 8 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA).
    Prism
    suggested: (PRISM, RRID:SCR_005375)
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.