Diverse functional autoantibodies in patients with COVID-19
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.10.20247205: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Ethics statement: This study was approved by Yale Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Boards (FWA00002571, protocol ID 2000027690).
Consent: Informed consent was obtained from all enrolled patients and healthcare workers.
IACUC: All procedures used in this study (sex-matched, age-matched) complied with federal guidelines and the institutional policies of the Yale School of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee.Randomization not detected. Blinding Cytokines and FACS analyses were performed blinded. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resou… SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.10.20247205: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Ethics statement: This study was approved by Yale Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Boards (FWA00002571, protocol ID 2000027690).
Consent: Informed consent was obtained from all enrolled patients and healthcare workers.
IACUC: All procedures used in this study (sex-matched, age-matched) complied with federal guidelines and the institutional policies of the Yale School of Medicine Animal Care and Use Committee.Randomization not detected. Blinding Cytokines and FACS analyses were performed blinded. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Antibodies: Anti-human antibodies used in this study, together with vendors and dilutions, are listed as follows: BB515 anti-hHLA-DR (G46-6) (1:400 Anti-humansuggested: Noneanti-hHLA-DR ( G46-6 )suggested: NoneAnti-mouse antibodies used in this study, together with vendors and dilutions, are listed as follows: FITC anti-mCD11c (N418) (1:400) (BioLegend), PerCP-Cy5.5 or FITC anti-mLy6C (HK1.4) (1:400) (BioLegend), PE or BV605 or BV711 anti-mNK1.1 (PK136) (1:400) (BioLegend), PE-Cy7 anti-mB220 (RA3-6B2) (1:200) (BioLegend), APC anti-mXCR1 (ZET) (1:200) (BioLegend), APC or AlexaFluor 700 or APC-Cy7 anti-mCD4 (RM4-5) (1:400) (BioLegend), APC-Cy7 anti-mLy6G (1A8) (1:400) (BioLegend), BV605 anti-mCD45 (30-F11) (1:400) (BioLegend), BV711 or PerCP-Cy5.5 anti-mCD8a (53-6.7) (1:400) (BioLegend), AlexaFluor 700 or BV785 anti-mCD11b (M1/70) (1:400) (BioLegend), PE anti-mCXCR3 (CXCR3-173) (1:200) (BioLegend), PE-Cy7 anti-mTCRgd Anti-mousesuggested: (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-70589, RRID:AB_1120501)anti-mCD11csuggested: Noneanti-mLy6Csuggested: Noneanti-mNK1.1suggested: Noneanti-mB220 ( RA3-6B2 )suggested: Noneanti-mXCR1suggested: Noneanti-mCD4suggested: Noneanti-mLy6Gsuggested: Noneanti-mCD45suggested: Noneanti-mCD8asuggested: Noneanti-mCD11bsuggested: Noneanti-mCXCR3suggested: NoneCXCR3-173suggested: NonePE-Cy7suggested: NoneFor GPCR N-terminal extracellular domains, these yeast were pooled together with transfected yeast that were used to construct the previously described exoproteome library and a limited dilution of clones were sub-sampled, induced, and stained for FLAG using 1:100 anti-FLAG PE antibody (BioLegend). anti-FLAGsuggested: NonePlates were washed three times with PBS-T (PBS with 0.1% Tween-20) and 50 μL of HRP anti-Human IgG Antibody at 1:5000 dilution (GenScript) or anti-Human IgM-Peroxidase Antibody at 1:5000 dilution (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in dilution solution were added to each well. anti-Human IgGsuggested: Noneanti-Human IgM-Peroxidasesuggested: NonePercent max signal was calculated by subtracting background MFI and calculating values as a percentage of GM-CSF induced pSTAT5 MFI in the absence of IgG. Functional Validation of CXCL1 and CXCL7 Autoantibodies: HTLA cells, a HEK293-derived cell line that stably expresses β-arrestin-TEV and tTA-Luciferase, were seeded in wells of a sterile tissue culture grade flat bottom 96-well plate (35,000 cells/well) in 100 μL DMEM (+ 10% FBS, 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin). CXCL1suggested: NoneCXCL7suggested: NonetTA-Luciferasesuggested: NoneFollowing a wash, cells were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/32 antibodies (BioXCell) for 30 min at 4 °C. anti-mouse CD16/32suggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources Expi293 cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were transfected and maintained according to manufacturer protocols. Expi293suggested: RRID:CVCL_D615)For protein production, Hi-5 cells were infected with P2 virus at a previously optimized titer and harvested 3–5 days after infection. Hi-5suggested: NoneFunctional Validation of GM-CSF Autoantibodies: TF-1 cells were starved of recombinant GM-CSF (PreproTech, 300-03) eighteen hours prior to experiments. TF-1suggested: NoneExperimental Models: Organisms/Strains Sentences Resources Mice: B6.Cg-Tg(K18-ACE2)2Prlmn/J (K18-hACE2) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratories and were subsequently bred and housed at Yale University. B6.Cg-Tg(K18-ACE2)2Prlmn/J ( K18-hACE2 )suggested: NoneSoftware and Algorithms Sentences Resources Ethics statement: This study was approved by Yale Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Boards (FWA00002571, protocol ID 2000027690). Yale Human Research Protection Programsuggested: NoneThe clinical data were collected using EPIC EHR and REDCap 9.3.6 software. REDCapsuggested: (REDCap, RRID:SCR_003445)The band corresponding to 257 base pairs was cut out and DNA (NGS library) was extracted using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) according to standard manufacturer protocols. NGSsuggested: (PM4NGS, RRID:SCR_019164)SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody ELISA measurement: SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies were measured as previously described40. SARS-CoV-2suggested: (Active Motif Cat# 91351, RRID:AB_2847848)Data were analysed using FlowJo software version 10.6 software (Tree Star). FlowJosuggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)Data analysis was performed using R, MATLAB, and GraphPad Prism. MATLABsuggested: (MATLAB, RRID:SCR_001622)GraphPad Prismsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.10.20247205: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Materials and Methods Ethics statement This study was approved by Yale Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Boards (FWA00002571, protocol ID 2000027690). Randomization not detected. Blinding Cytokines and FACS analyses were performed blinded. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Antibodies Anti-human antibodies used in this study, together with vendors and dilutions, are listed as follows: BB515 anti-hHLA-DR (G46-6) (1:400 Anti-humansuggested: None…SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.10.20247205: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Materials and Methods Ethics statement This study was approved by Yale Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Boards (FWA00002571, protocol ID 2000027690). Randomization not detected. Blinding Cytokines and FACS analyses were performed blinded. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Antibodies Anti-human antibodies used in this study, together with vendors and dilutions, are listed as follows: BB515 anti-hHLA-DR (G46-6) (1:400 Anti-humansuggested: Noneanti-hHLA-DR ( G46-6 )suggested: NoneAntimouse antibodies used in this study, together with vendors and dilutions, are listed as follows: FITC anti-mCD11c (N418) (1:400) (BioLegend), PerCP-Cy5.5 or FITC antimLy6C (HK1.4) (1:400) (BioLegend), PE or BV605 or BV711 anti-mNK1.1 (PK136) (1:400) (BioLegend), PE-Cy7 anti-mB220 (RA3-6B2) (1:200) (BioLegend), APC anti-mXCR1 (ZET) (1:200) (BioLegend), APC or AlexaFluor 700 or APC-Cy7 anti-mCD4 (RM4-5) (1:400) (BioLegend), APC-Cy7 anti-mLy6G (1A8) (1:400) (BioLegend), BV605 antimCD45 (30-F11) (1:400) (BioLegend), BV711 or PerCP-Cy5.5 anti-mCD8a (53-6.7) (1:400) (BioLegend), AlexaFluor 700 or BV785 anti-mCD11b (M1/70) (1:400) (BioLegend), PE anti-mCXCR3 (CXCR3-173) (1:200) (BioLegend), PE-Cy7 antimTCRgd Antimousesuggested: (C. Birchmeier, Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine; Berlin; Germany Cat# Guinea pig anti-mouse Tlx3 polyclonal antibody, RRID:AB_2532145)anti-mCD11csuggested: NoneantimLy6Csuggested: Noneanti-mNK1.1suggested: Noneanti-mB220 ( RA3-6B2 )suggested: Noneanti-mXCR1suggested: Noneanti-mCD4suggested: Noneanti-mLy6Gsuggested: NoneantimCD45suggested: Noneanti-mCD8asuggested: Noneanti-mCD11bsuggested: Noneanti-mCXCR3suggested: NoneCXCR3-173suggested: NonePE-Cy7suggested: NoneFor GPCR N-terminal extracellular domains, these yeast were pooled together with transfected yeast that were used to construct the previously described exoproteome library and a limited dilution of clones were sub-sampled, induced, and stained for FLAG using 1:100 anti-FLAG PE antibody (BioLegend). anti-FLAGsuggested: NonePlates were washed three times with PBS-T (PBS with 0.1% Tween-20) and 50 μL of HRP anti-Human IgG Antibody at 1:5000 dilution (GenScript) or anti-Human IgM-Peroxidase Antibody at 1:5000 dilution (Sigma-Aldrich) diluted in dilution solution were added to each well. anti-Human IgGsuggested: Noneanti-Human IgM-Peroxidasesuggested: NonePercent max signal was calculated by subtracting background MFI and calculating values as a percentage of GM-CSF induced pSTAT5 MFI in the absence of IgG. Functional Validation of CXCL1 and CXCL7 Autoantibodies HTLA cells, a HEK293-derived cell line that stably expresses β-arrestin-TEV and tTALuciferase, were seeded in wells of a sterile tissue culture grade flat bottom 96-well plate (35,000 cells/well) in 100 μL DMEM (+ 10% FBS, 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin). CXCL1suggested: NoneCXCL7suggested: NoneFollowing a wash, cells were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/32 antibodies (BioXCell) for 30 min at 4 °C. anti-mouse CD16/32suggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources Expi293 cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were transfected and maintained according to manufacturer protocols. Expi293suggested: RRID:CVCL_D615)For protein production, Hi-5 cells were infected with P2 virus at a previously optimized titer and harvested 3–5 days after infection. Hi-5suggested: NoneExperimental Models: Organisms/Strains Sentences Resources Mice B6.Cg-Tg(K18-ACE2)2Prlmn/J (K18-hACE2) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratories and were subsequently bred and housed at Yale University. B6.Cg-Tg(K18-ACE2)2Prlmn/J ( K18-hACE2 )suggested: NoneSoftware and Algorithms Sentences Resources Materials and Methods Ethics statement This study was approved by Yale Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Boards (FWA00002571, protocol ID 2000027690). Yale Human Research Protection Programsuggested: NoneThe clinical data were collected using EPIC EHR and REDCap 9.3.6 software. REDCapsuggested: (REDCap, RRID:SCR_003445)The band corresponding to 257 base pairs was cut out and DNA (NGS library) was extracted using a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) according to standard manufacturer protocols. NGSsuggested: (PM4NGS, RRID:SCR_019164)Data were analysed using FlowJo software version 10.6 software (Tree Star). FlowJosuggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)Data analysis was performed using R, MATLAB, and GraphPad Prism. Reporting Summary Further information on research design will be made available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article. MATLABsuggested: (MATLAB, RRID:SCR_001622)GraphPadsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
About SciScore
SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.
-
-
-