Pediatric COVID-19 patients in South Brazil show abundant viral mRNA and strong specific anti-viral responses
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
COVID-19 manifests as a milder disease in children than adults, but the underlying mechanisms are not fully characterized. Here we assess the difference in cellular or humoral immune responses of pediatric and adult COVID-19 patients to see if these factors contribute to the severity dichotomy. Children’s non-specific immune profile is dominated by naive lymphocytes and HLA-DR high CX3CR1 low dendritic cells; meanwhile, children show strong specific antibody and T cell responses for viral structural proteins, with their T cell responses differing from adults by having weaker CD8 + TNF + T cells responses to S peptide pool but stronger responses to N and M peptide pools. Finally, viral mRNA is more abundant in pediatric patients. Our data thus support a scenario in which SARS-CoV-2 infected children contribute to transmission yet are less susceptible to COVID-19 symptoms due to strong and differential responses to the virus.
Article activity feed
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.13.21255139: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Ethics Statement: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB 30749720.4.1001.5330) at Hospital Moinhos de Vento and by the Ethics Committee at Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde (CAAE 30749720.4.3001.5345).
Consent: Legal consent was obtained from all participants or their legal guardians.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources After, were stained with the BD Horizon™ Fixable Viability Stain 510 together with antibodies for surface markers, as follows: anti-CD3-APC-H7 (clone SK7), anti-CD24-APC-H7 (clone ML5), … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.13.21255139: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Ethics Statement: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB 30749720.4.1001.5330) at Hospital Moinhos de Vento and by the Ethics Committee at Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde (CAAE 30749720.4.3001.5345).
Consent: Legal consent was obtained from all participants or their legal guardians.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources After, were stained with the BD Horizon™ Fixable Viability Stain 510 together with antibodies for surface markers, as follows: anti-CD3-APC-H7 (clone SK7), anti-CD24-APC-H7 (clone ML5), anti-HLA-DR-APC-H7 (clone G46-6), anti-CD4-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone RPA-T4), anti-CD27-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone M-T271), anti-CD11c-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone B-ly6), anti-CD14-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone M5E2), anti-CD8-FITC (clone HIT8a), anti-IgG-FITC (clone G18-145), Lineage 2-FITC (cat. 643397), anti-CD16-FITC (clone 3G8), anti-CXCR5 (CD185)-BB515 (clone RF8B2), anti-CD19-APC (clone HIB19), anti-CD127-Alexa 647 (clone HIL-7R-M21), anti-CX3CR1-Alexa647 (clone 2A9-1), anti-CD69-APC (clone FN50), anti-CD38-PE (clone HIT2), anti-ICOS (CD278)-PE (clone DX29), anti-CD141-PE (clone 1A4), anti-CD66b-PE (clone G10F5), anti-CD137 (4-1BB)-PE (clone 4B4-1), anti-HLA-DR-PE-Cy7 (clone G46-6), anti-CD19-PE-Cy7 (clone SJ25C1), anti-CD25-PE-Cy7 (clone 2A3), anti-CD45RA-PE-Cy7 (clone L48), anti-IgM-BV421 (clone G20-127), anti-PD-1 (CD279)-BV421 (clone MIH4), anti-CD303-BV421 (clone V24-785), anti-CD56-BV421 (clone NCAM 16), anti-CCR7-BV421 (clone 2-L1-A) antibodies. anti-CD3-APC-H7suggested: Noneanti-CD24-APC-H7suggested: Noneanti-HLA-DR-APC-H7suggested: Noneanti-CD27-PerCP-Cy5.5suggested: Noneanti-CD11c-PerCP-Cy5.5suggested: Noneanti-CD14-PerCP-Cy5.5suggested: Noneanti-CD8-FITCsuggested: Noneanti-IgG-FITCsuggested: (Miltenyi Biotec Cat# 130-093-192, RRID:AB_1036185)anti-CD16-FITCsuggested: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# F3668, RRID:AB_259555)anti-CXCR5suggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 552032, RRID:AB_394324)CD185)-BB515suggested: Noneanti-CD19-APCsuggested: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# SAB4700110, RRID:AB_10898737)anti-CD127-Alexasuggested: Noneanti-CX3CR1-Alexa647suggested: Noneanti-CD69-APCsuggested: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# SAB4700220, RRID:AB_10897283)anti-CD38-PEsuggested: (Sigma-Aldrich Cat# P6722, RRID:AB_261136)anti-ICOSsuggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 557801, RRID:AB_396877)CD278)-PEsuggested: Noneanti-CD141-PEsuggested: Noneanti-CD66b-PEsuggested: Noneanti-CD137suggested: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# EPX140-15803-901, RRID:AB_2576106)4-1BB)-PEsuggested: Noneanti-HLA-DR-PE-Cy7suggested: Noneanti-CD19-PE-Cy7suggested: Noneanti-CD25-PE-Cy7suggested: Noneanti-CD45RA-PE-Cy7suggested: Noneanti-IgM-BV421suggested: Noneanti-PD-1 (CD279)-BV421suggested: Noneanti-CD303-BV421suggested: Noneanti-CD56-BV421suggested: NoneFor intracellular staining, cells were first stained for surface markers and subsequently fixed and permeabilized using the Transcription Factor Buffer Set (BD Biosciences-Pharmingen, USA), then stained with anti-Ki-67-BV421 (clone B56), anti-Perforin-Alexa 647 (clone δG9), and anti-Granzyme B-BV421 (clone GB11) antibodies. anti-Ki-67-BV421suggested: Noneanti-Perforin-Alexasuggested: Noneanti-Granzyme B-BV421suggested: NoneFollowing in vitro stimulation assays with specific peptides, cells were stained with the BD Horizon™ Fixable Viability Stain 510 and anti-CD3-PE-Cy7 (clone SK7), anti-CD4-PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone RPA-T4), anti-CD8-APC-H7 (clone SK1), anti-CCR7-BV421 (clone 2-L1-A), and subsequently fixed and permeabilized using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences-Pharmingen, USA), then stained with anti-IFNγ-FITC (clone 4S.B3), anti-TNF (clone MAb11) and anti-IL-17-PE (clone SCPL1362) antibodies. anti-CD3-PE-Cy7suggested: Noneanti-CD4-PerCP-Cy5.5suggested: Noneanti-CD8-APC-H7suggested: Noneanti-CCR7-BV421suggested: Noneanti-IFNγ-FITCsuggested: Noneanti-TNFsuggested: Noneanti-IL-17-PEsuggested: NoneELISA: Plasma was tested for IgG and IgA antibodies to S-RBD protein (#RP-87678 - Invitrogen, USA) and N protein (kindly provided by Dr. Ricardo Gazinelli - Fiocruz Belo Horizonte, Brazil) using a protocol described in (16). IgAsuggested: None#RP-87678suggested: NoneSoftware and Algorithms Sentences Resources PBMCs were next isolated by density-gradient centrifugation using Ficoll–Paque™ PLUS (GE Healthcare®), and either studied directly or resuspended in FBS 5% DMSO and stored in liquid nitrogen until use. GE Healthcare®suggested: (GE Healthcare, RRID:SCR_000004)All samples were analyzed using a BD Biosciences - FACSCanto II and FlowJo 10.7.1 software. FlowJosuggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)All analyses were performed either in GraphPad Prism v.9 or R and sometimes confirmed in Python. 3D analysis of PCA was plotted in Python. GraphPad Prismsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Pythonsuggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:The main limitation of this study is that it is mostly an exploratory, descriptive one, and compares individuals in different age groups. We believe this was a valid approach given the magnitude of what is unknown at the moment. Usually, biomarkers in peripheral blood are only useful when highly correlated with outcomes. Yet, most studies that seek to understand how immune responses can correlate with protection compare adult s with mild and severe disease, and it is known that these are in different age groups. At present, the best age-matched controls for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients are still unknown. Certainly, the absence of a pre-pandemic healthy children control group is a limitation of this and all the other studies that focused on the general, non-specific immune profile of children with COVID-19. There is still much to be understood about immunological differences not only between pediatric and adult COVID-19 patients but also in other diseases. In this sense, we believe our work contributes significant information which was collected in a completely unbiased investigation -we did not know what differences or similarities to expect. At the time the project started, COVID-19 numbers in Brazil were still not high and the frequency of MISC patients or children with severe manifestations of the disease was still too low to include. Inclusion of patients was easiest in ASD because they were admitted to the hospital, thus their time of symptoms to sample collection is sho...
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 32. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-