Potent SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies with protective efficacy against newly emerged mutational variants

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Accumulating mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 Spike (S) protein can increase the possibility of immune escape, challenging the present COVID-19 prophylaxis and clinical interventions. Here, 3 receptor binding domain (RBD) specific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), 58G6, 510A5 and 13G9, with high neutralizing potency blocking authentic SARS-CoV-2 virus display remarkable efficacy against authentic B.1.351 virus. Surprisingly, structural analysis has revealed that 58G6 and 13G9 both recognize the steric region S 470–495 on the RBD, overlapping the E484K mutation presented in B.1.351. Also, 58G6 directly binds to another region S 450–458 in the RBD. Significantly, 58G6 and 510A5 both demonstrate prophylactic efficacy against authentic SARS-CoV-2 and B.1.351 viruses in the transgenic mice expressing human ACE2 (hACE2), protecting weight loss and reducing virus loads. Together, we have evidenced 2 potent neutralizing Abs with unique mechanism targeting authentic SARS-CoV-2 mutants, which can be promising candidates to fulfill the urgent needs for the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.19.440481: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: The original studies to obtain blood samples after written informed consent were previously described and had been approved by the Ethics Board of ChongQing Medical University24.
    IRB: The original studies to obtain blood samples after written informed consent were previously described and had been approved by the Ethics Board of ChongQing Medical University24.
    Sex as a biological variableSix-to eight-week-old female hACE2 mice were treated with 58G6 or 510A5 monoclonal antibody at a concentration of 10 mg/kg by intraperitoneal route, respectively.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Sequence analysis of antigen-specific mAbs: IMGT/V-QUEST (http://www.imgt.org/IMGT_vquest/vquest) and IgBLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/igblast/), MIXCR (https://mixcr.readthedocs.io/en/master/) and VDJtools (https://vdjtools-doc.readthedocs.io/en/master/overlap.html) tools were used to do the variable region analysis and annotation for each antibody clone.
    antigen-specific mAbs: IMGT/V-QUEST ( http://www.imgt.org/IMGT_vquest/vquest )
    suggested: None
    A CM5 chip (GE Healthcare) was linked with anti-human IgG-Fc antibody to capture about 9000 response units of the neutralizing Abs.
    anti-human IgG-Fc
    suggested: None
    The next days, the membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated Goat-anti-human Fc antibody (Abcam, ab99759, 1:10000) for 1 h at RT.
    ab99759
    suggested: (Abcam Cat# ab99759, RRID:AB_10673762)
    The ELISA plates were washed 4 times by blocking buffer and 50 μL Goat F(ab’)2 Anti-Human IgG (Fab’)2 secondary antibody conjugated with ALP (Abcam, ab98532, 1:2000) was incubated with the plate at RT for 30 mins.
    Anti-Human IgG
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    After the incubation, the mixtures were then transferred into 96-well plates, which were seeded with Vero E6 cells.
    Vero E6
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_XD71)
    HEK293T cells were grown to 80% confluency before transfection with VSV-G pseudotyped ΔG-luciferase, pWPXL and pSPAX2.
    HEK293T
    suggested: None
    After 72 hrs, the luciferase activities of infected HEK293T/ACE2 cells were detected by the Bright-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega, E2650)
    HEK293T/ACE2
    suggested: None
    Expi293 cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) cultured in Freestyle 293 Expression Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) were maintained at 37 °C.
    Expi293
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_D615)
    Authentic SARS-CoV-2 and B.1.351 viruses and animal study: Authentic SARS-CoV-2 (WIV04) and B.1.351 (NPRC 2.062100001) viruses were propagated on the Vero-E6 cells and titrated by single layer plaque assay with standard procedure.
    Vero-E6
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    Production of pseudovirus bearing S protein: pVSVG expressing SARS-CoV-2 S protein was constructed as previously described29.
    pVSVG
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_85140)
    HEK293T cells were grown to 80% confluency before transfection with VSV-G pseudotyped ΔG-luciferase, pWPXL and pSPAX2.
    pSPAX2
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_12260)
    Protein expression and purification: To express the prefusion S ectodomain, the gene encoding residues 1-1208 of SARS-CoV-2 S (GenBank: MN908947.3) with a C-terminal T4 fibritin trimerization motif, an HRV-3C protease cleavage site, a Twin-Strep-tag and an 8 × His-tag was synthesized, and cloned into the mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1, which was a kind gift from L.
    pcDNA3.1
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_79663)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The IC50 and IC80 of the evaluated mAbs was and calculated by a four-parameter logistic regression using GraphPad Prism 8.0.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    Sequence analysis of antigen-specific mAbs: IMGT/V-QUEST (http://www.imgt.org/IMGT_vquest/vquest) and IgBLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/igblast/), MIXCR (https://mixcr.readthedocs.io/en/master/) and VDJtools (https://vdjtools-doc.readthedocs.io/en/master/overlap.html) tools were used to do the variable region analysis and annotation for each antibody clone.
    IgBLAST
    suggested: (IgBLAST, RRID:SCR_002873)
    2605 micrographs were collected in a single session with a defocus range comprised between 1.0 and 2.8 μm using SerialEM.
    SerialEM
    suggested: (SerialEM, RRID:SCR_017293)
    Cryo-EM data processing: All dose-fractioned images were motion-corrected and dose-weighted by MotionCorr2 software32 and their contrast transfer functions were estimated by cryoSPARC patch CTF estimation33.
    MotionCorr2
    suggested: None
    The following 2D, 3D classifications, and refinements were all performed in cryoSPARC.
    cryoSPARC
    suggested: (cryoSPARC, RRID:SCR_016501)
    Both of the 58G6 and 13G9 Fab models were first predicted using Phyre226 and then manually built in Coot 0.936 with the guidance of the cryo-EM electron density maps, and overall real-space refinements were performed using Phenix 1.1837.
    Coot
    suggested: (Coot, RRID:SCR_014222)
    Phenix
    suggested: (Phenix, RRID:SCR_014224)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We found bar graphs of continuous data. We recommend replacing bar graphs with more informative graphics, as many different datasets can lead to the same bar graph. The actual data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. For more information, please see Weissgerber et al (2015).


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.