Heterotypic vaccination responses against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.03.22.485418: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableAnimal vaccination: Animal immunization were performed previously on 6-8 weeks female C57BL/6Ncr mice purchased from Charles River in two sets of experiments: 1) sequential vaccination with two doses of 1μg WT LNP-mRNA followed by 10μg Omicron BA.1 or WT boosters7; 2) vaccination with two doses of 1μg WT, B.1.351, B.1.617 LNP-mRNA8.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Cell culture: 293T and hACE2-293FT cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM, Fisher) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone) and penicillin (100 U/ml)-streptomycin (100 ug/ml).
    hACE2-293FT
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    Animal vaccination: Animal immunization were performed previously on 6-8 weeks female C57BL/6Ncr mice purchased from Charles River in two sets of experiments: 1) sequential vaccination with two doses of 1μg WT LNP-mRNA followed by 10μg Omicron BA.1 or WT boosters7; 2) vaccination with two doses of 1μg WT, B.1.351, B.1.617 LNP-mRNA8.
    C57BL/6Ncr
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.