COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among reproductive-aged female tier 1A healthcare workers in a United States Medical Center
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.29.21256186: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: The study was deemed exempt research by the study site’s Institutional Review Board (HUM00193484).
Consent: Participation was voluntary and consent was attained through survey continuation.Sex as a biological variable We collapsed gender into “female,” “male,” and “other;” some exhibits include only female and male groups, due to small numbers. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains Sentences Resources Due to small numbers of respondents in certain racial and ethnic groups, we collapsed race/ethnicity into four categories (Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Asian, and non-Hispanic … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.04.29.21256186: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: The study was deemed exempt research by the study site’s Institutional Review Board (HUM00193484).
Consent: Participation was voluntary and consent was attained through survey continuation.Sex as a biological variable We collapsed gender into “female,” “male,” and “other;” some exhibits include only female and male groups, due to small numbers. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains Sentences Resources Due to small numbers of respondents in certain racial and ethnic groups, we collapsed race/ethnicity into four categories (Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Asian, and non-Hispanic Black/Mixed/Other). non-Hispanic Whitesuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Study limitations include an opt-in sampling approach, which may bias toward those with stronger opinions (either positive or negative) about the COVID-19 vaccine, and our cross-sectional design, which cannot capture rapidly evolving attitudes or beliefs. In this large study of a diverse sample of medical center employees’ COVID-19 vaccine intentions and attitudes as vaccination was made available to them, we document high vaccine acceptance overall but notable variation across health care employee roles, gender, and racial-ethnic groups. Our findings suggest important opportunities to empathetically engage those with COVID-19 vaccine concerns and optimize vaccine coverage across our healthcare system.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
