Validation and Invalidation of SARS-CoV-2 Papain-like Protease Inhibitors

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.11.04.467342: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Briefly, 293T cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin antibiotics in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. 96-well Greiner plate (catalog no. 655090) was seeded with 293T cells to overnight 70–90% confluency.
    293T
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    SARS-CoV-2 PLpro expression and purification: SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLpro) gene (ORF 1ab 1564–1876) from strain BetaCoV/Wuhan/WIV04/2019 with E. coli codon optimization was ordered from GenScript in the pET28b(+) vector.
    pET28b(+
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_67287)
    50 ng of pcDNA3-flipGFP-PLpro-T2A-mCherry plasmid and 50 ng of pcDNA3.1-SARS2-PLpro were used each well in the presence of transfection reagent TransIT-293 (Mirus) per manufacturer protocol.
    pcDNA3-flipGFP-PLpro-T2A-mCherry
    suggested: None
    pcDNA3.1-SARS2-PLpro
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.