Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 omicron infection in residents of long-term care facilities in England (VIVALDI): a prospective, cohort study

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. Vincent Auvigne

    Review 4: "Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in residents of Long-Term Care"

    This preprint examines the mortality and hospitalization rates of the SARS-CoV-2 Omnicronvariant and compares them to the Delta variant. Reviewers found the study reliable but requires additional literary citations.

  2. Srikanth Umakanthan

    Review 3: "Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in residents of Long-Term Care"

    This preprint examines the mortality and hospitalization rates of the SARS-CoV-2 Omnicronvariant and compares them to the Delta variant. Reviewers found the study reliable but requires additional literary citations.

  3. Jonas Bjรถrk

    Review 2: "Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in residents of Long-Term Care"

    This preprint examines the mortality and hospitalization rates of the SARS-CoV-2 Omnicronvariant and compares them to the Delta variant. Reviewers found the study reliable but requires additional literary citations.

  4. Andrรฉ Peralta-Santos

    Review 1: "Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in residents of Long-Term Care"

    This preprint examines the mortality and hospitalization rates of the SARS-CoV-2 Omnicronvariant and compares them to the Delta variant. Reviewers found the study reliable but requires additional literary citations.

  5. Strength of evidence

    Reviewers: Andrรฉ Peralta-Santos (University of Washington) | ๐Ÿ“—๐Ÿ“—๐Ÿ“—๐Ÿ“—โ—ป๏ธ
    Jonas Bjรถrk (Lund University) | ๐Ÿ“˜๐Ÿ“˜๐Ÿ“˜๐Ÿ“˜๐Ÿ“˜
    Srikanth Umakanthan (The University of the West Indies) | ๐Ÿ“—๐Ÿ“—๐Ÿ“—๐Ÿ“—โ—ป๏ธ
    Vincent Auvigne (Santรฉ Publique France)๐Ÿ“’๐Ÿ“’๐Ÿ“’ โ—ป๏ธโ—ป๏ธ

  6. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.21.22269605: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power AnalysisFormal sample size calculation was not undertaken.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Covariates included age (centred at the median), sex, region, LTCF size, prior natural infection (at least one of: previous positive PCR or LFD result in > 28 days before their positive test, prior hospital admission for SARS-CoV-2, or detection of anti-nucleocapsid IgG antibodies).
    SARS-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    anti-nucleocapsid IgG
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Our study has several limitations. First, our ability to assess the effect of Omicron on mortality is constrained by the duration of follow-up in our study to date. Second, as not all laboratories use assays that include the S-gene target, it was not possible to identify all samples with SGTF or to confirm that samples with SGTF were indeed Omicron. However, all 26 samples that had been sequenced and tested for S-gene were concordant. The recent emergence of a sub-variant of Omicron of the BA.2 lineage that does not exhibit SGTF are unlikely to have affected our results as, based on our analysis of data from the UKโ€™s genomic surveillance programme, only 24 of samples of this lineage have been identified to date. Finally, it is likely that we underestimated the prevalence of past infection in our cohort (10.5%), which is significantly lower than published seroprevalence estimates from the LTCF population, 28 because only a subset of residents had been tested for antibodies to nucleocapsid.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    ISRCTN14447421NANA


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.