An evaluation of prospective COVID-19 modelling studies in the USA: from data to science translation

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.04.18.22273992: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    The searches of Scopus and PubMed were carried out on August 20, 2021, and our final selection of papers was roughly evenly distributed from February 2020 to August 2021 (Figure 2).
    PubMed
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    This constant changing of dynamics that drive COVID-19 transmission coupled with data quality limitations has hindered model accuracy. Translation: Transparency: Although the translational aspect of modeling is often overlooked in academic papers, better communication of modeling is an integral part of producing useful models. One of the most important aspects of successful modeling translation is transparency in how models are built and how they should be used, which is covered in the aforementioned EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines176. Since COVID-19 modeling attracted many researchers without prior infectious disease modeling experience, the adoption of epidemic reporting guidelines is especially helpful to help modelers support decision-makers and avoid causing unintentional harm. To advance knowledge of best practices for translation, modelers should prioritize documentation of the process of sharing models with decision-makers when possible. For example, this paper documents the process of modelers working with policymakers in Utah to provide COVD-19 decision support177. By neglecting to share their experiences and knowledge on translation of models, modelers are missing an opportunity to harness the collaborative power of academia to identify best practices for translation and boost the utility of their work. Control the Messaging: Due to the uncertainty and fear surrounding an unprecedented outbreak, modeling results were sometimes sensationalized by the media or were bent to ...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.