Remote COVID-19 Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
No abstract available
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.23.21268279: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics Consent: Data collection in general practice (NWL and RSC): NWL and Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) [13, 14] primary care practices completed the RECAP-V0 electronic template in EMIS or SystmOne and captured the verbal consent of patients upon completion of the template. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization The extent of missing data for each variable (outcome and predictors) was assessed on degree of missingness, patterns (at random or not at random), and possible reasons. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis Sample size calculation: We estimated a minimum sample size of 1,317 participants for model development and 1,400 … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.23.21268279: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics Consent: Data collection in general practice (NWL and RSC): NWL and Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) [13, 14] primary care practices completed the RECAP-V0 electronic template in EMIS or SystmOne and captured the verbal consent of patients upon completion of the template. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization The extent of missing data for each variable (outcome and predictors) was assessed on degree of missingness, patterns (at random or not at random), and possible reasons. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis Sample size calculation: We estimated a minimum sample size of 1,317 participants for model development and 1,400 for model external validation assuming 10% hospitalisation rate for COVID-19, a maximum of 24 predictor variables, a binary outcome (hospital admission), and a minimum 85% model specificity on validation. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code.
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
00123-6&r=&sid=DBULFPXG&qs=%7B%7D&cid=57301953)