COVID-19 in health-care workers in three hospitals in the south of the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
No abstract available
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.04.26.20079418: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee Brabant, with a waiver of written informed consent (METC Brabant/20.134/NW2020–26).
Consent: Verbal informed consent was obtained from all HCWs for SARS-CoV-2 testing, sequencing and data collection.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The consensus genome was extracted and positions with a coverage <30 were replaced with an “N” with a custom script using biopython and pysam, as previously described12. biopythonsuggested: (Biopython, RRID:SCR_007173)The alignment was … SciScore for 10.1101/2020.04.26.20079418: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee Brabant, with a waiver of written informed consent (METC Brabant/20.134/NW2020–26).
Consent: Verbal informed consent was obtained from all HCWs for SARS-CoV-2 testing, sequencing and data collection.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The consensus genome was extracted and positions with a coverage <30 were replaced with an “N” with a custom script using biopython and pysam, as previously described12. biopythonsuggested: (Biopython, RRID:SCR_007173)The alignment was manually inspected and trimmed of the 5’ and 3’ UTRs in Geneious v11.1.3 (geneious.com) to include only coding regions. Geneioussuggested: (Geneious, RRID:SCR_010519)Bayesian phylogenetic trees were estimated using BEAST v1.10.422 using an HKY nucleotide subsititution model23 and a strict molecular clock. BEASTsuggested: (BEAST, RRID:SCR_010228)The maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree was inferred using TreeAnnotator and visualized using baltic (https://github.com/evogytis/baltic) and custom python scripts. pythonsuggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)All analyses were performed with SPSS version 25.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). SPSSsuggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-