Clinical characteristics and outcomes of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized for COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.14.20130922: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    We systematically searched and identified studies published between 1 January 2020 and 31 May 2020, through electronic searches using MEDLINE, Europe PMC, Proquest, Ebscohost, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central, Clinicaltrial.gov and from preprint websites (Preprint.org and MedRxiV.org).
    MEDLINE
    suggested: (MEDLINE, RRID:SCR_002185)
    Proquest
    suggested: (ProQuest, RRID:SCR_006093)
    Google Scholar
    suggested: (Google Scholar, RRID:SCR_008878)
    Cochrane Central
    suggested: (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, RRID:SCR_006576)
    We used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free word to construct our search terms related to venous thromboembolism (venous thromboembolism OR deep vein thrombosis OR pulmonary embolism), coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19 and SARS- CoV-2).
    MeSH
    suggested: (MeSH, RRID:SCR_004750)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.