Mortality, critical illness, and mechanical ventilation among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 on therapeutic anticoagulants
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.22.20179911: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The Northwestern University Institutional Review Board approved this study (Approval Reference STU00212532). Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Our study has several limitations. First, our-cohort definition and clinical data relied on the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.22.20179911: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The Northwestern University Institutional Review Board approved this study (Approval Reference STU00212532). Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Our study has several limitations. First, our-cohort definition and clinical data relied on the accuracy of ICD-10 coding for disease diagnoses, although we did manually review 372 (22%) charts which confirmed COVID-19 infection and assessed timing and indication for therapeutic anticoagulation. Second, our study was observational, and despite attempting to control for confounding clinical variables, there may have been unidentified confounding factors. Third, we did not evaluate outcomes by individual anticoagulant drug. It is possible that the clinical effects of DOACs and LMWH differ in patients with COVID-19 (27,43). Finally, we did not control for the number of days subjects received new therapeutic anticoagulation because we were unable to determine the timing of starting these medications within the course of COVID-19 infection. In conclusion, continuation of home therapeutic anticoagulation was associated with neither benefit nor harm in subjects hospitalized with COVID-19. Subjects with COVID-19 who had not previously been anticoagulated and who were empirically prescribed therapeutic anticoagulation during their hospitalization had worse outcomes. Our findings do not support routine use of therapeutic anticoagulation for patients with COVID-19 infection in the absence of other indications (i.e., atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism) until randomized controlled trials provide further evidence.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
-