A phenomenological approach to assessing the effectiveness of COVID-19 related nonpharmaceutical interventions in Germany
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.05.20146837: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Strengths and limitations: One strength of the present study is the relative simplicity of the analysis. The current approach allows for a time-related analysis of NPIs based on a rather simple model which does not require …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.05.20146837: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Strengths and limitations: One strength of the present study is the relative simplicity of the analysis. The current approach allows for a time-related analysis of NPIs based on a rather simple model which does not require further assumptions concerning the disease under study. Thus, the methodology can be easily transferred to other pandemics, countries, or regions as only time series of infections are necessary. In the future, the research design should be applied to international comparisons, incorporating both Scandinavian and South-European countries. Another strength is the utilization of realistic infection dates, which was not incorporated in previous studies. Moreover, regarding three different indicators allows for a more differentiated picture of infections over time. The temporal development of the three indicators was also contrasted with conducted tests over time. However, in the absence of daily test data, the impact of changing test volumes was not assessed directly. Another limitation results from the phenomenological nature of the regression models utilized for time series analysis. As the only explanatory variable is time, we can question the impacts of the regarded interventions but cannot explain the factors causing the temporal development of infections directly.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
-
-