Mental health and sleep habits during preclinical years of medical school

  1. Blake McKinley
  2. Bryan Daines
  3. Mitchell Allen
  4. Kayd Pulsipher
  5. Isain Zapata
  6. Benjamin Wilde

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1016/j.sleep.2022.09.001
  2. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.13.22269102: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: Follow-up survey invitations were emailed to those students that signed the informed consent to participate in this study and completed the first survey.
    IRB: The research project was reviewed by the Rocky Vista University Institutional Review Board with the corresponding IRB# 2019-0070.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
    SAS Institute
    suggested: (Statistical Analysis System, RRID:SCR_008567)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Limitations and future directions: A limitation of this study can be its representativeness since data was collected from a single medical school consisting of two campuses. Also, the sleep quality analysis added an additional assessment, PSQI, that was not available for the first year. Future research should be directed at expanding the medical student population surveyed across multiple universities to better generalize results. Furthermore, studies should incorporate medical students in years three and four to provide data that spans the entire medical school training.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  3. Version published to 10.1101/2022.01.13.22269102v1 on medRxiv