Learning about COVID-19 across borders: public health information and adherence among international travellers to the UK

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.08.04.21261333: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Several limitations exist for this study. First, our sample of international travellers was limited due to the rapid implementation of travel restrictions and border closures in multiple countries in response to the rapidly changing situation of COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, all participants of telephone interviews reported that they had essential business or reasonable needs to travel abroad, our findings therefore may not be generalisable to those travelling for leisure purposes. However, the study benefits from being an early evaluation of adherence behaviour and responses to public health guidance among international travellers in the pandemic. Most importantly, it provides an opportunity to learn from the opening stages of the pandemic about how people navigate between differing national rules and guidance across borders. It provides insights that can inform recommendations for improving information provision and hence individual adherence for public health benefit. Public health implication: While international travellers were conscious of the potential risks associated with travel and keen to mitigate those risks, it is important to ensure that international travellers get information and official guidance on the key restrictions and preventive measures for the country to which they are travelling. The provision of a centralised and regularly updated official information hub would help to minimise possible confusion between different sources of guidance. In addition,...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.