Global burden of mental health problems among children and adolescents during COVID-19 pandemic: An umbrella review
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2022.04.22.22274169: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Limitations: This umbrella review has several limitations that must be addressed in future evidence syntheses. First, we included major databases but did not include preprint servers and other potential sources that may contain eligible reviews. Second, we …
SciScore for 10.1101/2022.04.22.22274169: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Limitations: This umbrella review has several limitations that must be addressed in future evidence syntheses. First, we included major databases but did not include preprint servers and other potential sources that may contain eligible reviews. Second, we identified multiple reviews with different methods and synthesized them narratively. A patient-level data synthesis from individual studies could have provided a more accurate and less overlapping view of the evidence landscape. Third, as systematic reviews and meta-analyses included primary studies published before conducting those reviews, a synthesis of the reviews is likely to miss insights from the most recent primary studies. Lastly, heterogeneity and publication biases were not assessed in this narrative umbrella study. Understanding those and addressing the same should be prioritized in future meta-research.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
