The effect of exercise and affect regulation skills on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.01.20144105: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study was approved by the local ethics committee for research at the Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences and registered on the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00021791).
Consent: Before starting the survey, participants provided informed consent.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Data preparation and statistical analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 26). SPSSsuggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.01.20144105: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: The study was approved by the local ethics committee for research at the Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences and registered on the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00021791).
Consent: Before starting the survey, participants provided informed consent.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Data preparation and statistical analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, version 26). SPSSsuggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Our study has several limitations: Since the design was cross-sectional, results cannot be interpreted causally. Further longitudinal data that will be available in the upcoming measurement will shed more light on the associations between changes in exercise and social support on the attenuation or aggravation of psychopathological symptoms. The sample was mostly composed of females. Further the mean age was quite low (mean age 33 year). Therefore, the representativeness of this sample is limited. Although the recruiting was not directed to people with mental disorders (such as clinics or hospitals) and it was announced as a study about the “protective factors for mental health”, there might be a self-selection bias. Especially people that suffered from mental problem might have been more interested in participating in the study causing the very high prevalence. Further methodological limitations comprise the assessment of the change in exercise and anxiety symptoms (only one item each). Further work-related and leisure-time related PA was not analyzed, which could bias our results. Lastly the model fit can be assumed as adequate for depression with an explained variance of 41 %, however the explained variance for anxiety (20 %) and sleep (26 %) can be considered as low.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.
-