Yeast-expressed recombinant SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain RBD203-N1 as a COVID-19 protein vaccine candidate

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.08.24.457518: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIACUC: The reaction was terminated with 100 μL of 1M HCl and absorption readings were taken at 450 nm using a BioTek EPOCH 2 microplate reader. 2.10. Preclinical Study Design: A preclinical study in mice was performed under the approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol at Baylor College of Medicine.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    A 1:3,000 dilution of an AP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (KPL) was used as the secondary antibody. 2.4. ELISA using Anti-RBD2l9-N1C1 Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies: In this experiment, we evaluated the binding of eight anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD219-WT mAbs (# 1128, 643, 486, 902, 854, 942, 748, and 102) to RBD203-N1 and RBD219-N1C1.
    Anti-RBD2l9-N1C1
    suggested: None
    anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD219-WT
    suggested: None
    RBD219-N1C1
    suggested: None
    After this binding step, the plates were washed with PBST four times followed by adding 100 μL 1:6,000 diluted HRP conjugated anti-mouse IgG antibodies (LSBiosciences) and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature.
    anti-mouse IgG
    suggested: None
    After this binding step, the plates were washed with PBST four times followed by adding 100 μL of 1:5,000 diluted anti-RBD219-WT horse sera followed by 1:10,000 diluted HRP conjugated anti-horse IgG antibodies and incubating for 1 hour at room temperature.
    anti-RBD219-WT
    suggested: None
    anti-horse IgG
    suggested: None
    6–8-week-old Female BALB/c mice were immunized twice intramuscularly (i.m.) at 21-day intervals and then euthanized 14 days after the second immunization. 2.11. Antigen-specific Antibody Measurements by ELISA: To examine RBD-specific antibodies in mouse sera, indirect ELISAs were conducted as described previously [13].
    Antigen-specific
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Next, 100 μL of sera-pseudovirus were added to 293T-hACE2 cells in 96-well poly-D-lysine coated culture plates.
    293T-hACE2
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    6–8-week-old Female BALB/c mice were immunized twice intramuscularly (i.m.) at 21-day intervals and then euthanized 14 days after the second immunization. 2.11. Antigen-specific Antibody Measurements by ELISA: To examine RBD-specific antibodies in mouse sera, indirect ELISAs were conducted as described previously [13].
    BALB/c
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    In short, the DNA encoding RBD203-N1 was synthesized and subcloned into the Pichia secretory expression vector pPICZαA (Invitrogen) using EcoRI/Xbal restriction sites (GenScript).
    pPICZαA
    suggested: None
    The RBD203-N1 pPICZαA/P. pastoris X33 construct was fermented in 5 L vessels [9, 11, 12].
    pPICZαA/P
    suggested: None
    The plasmids used for the pseudovirus production are the luciferase-encoding reporter plasmid (pNL4-3.lucR-E-),
    pNL4-3.lucR-E-
    suggested: None
    , Gag/Pol-encoding packaging construct (pΔ8.9), and codon-optimized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein expression plasmids (pcDNA3.1-CoV-2 S gene) based on clone p278-1.
    pcDNA3.1-CoV-2
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Raw data were first analyzed by Bio-Plex Manager software followed by Excel and Prism. 2.13.
    Bio-Plex Manager
    suggested: None
    Excel
    suggested: None
    Prism
    suggested: (PRISM, RRID:SCR_005375)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on page 23. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.