Differential immunogenicity of homologous versus heterologous boost in Ad26.COV2.S vaccine recipients

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.10.14.21264981: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: Study approval: All donors provided written consent.
    IRB: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the NUS Institutional Review Board (NUS-IRB-2021-292), the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (CIRB ref.:
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test (sVNT): The sVNT assay is a proxy measurement of antibodies inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 virus binding to the host cell receptor, human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2), and has been shown to correlate closely with antibody neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 (23).
    hACE2
    suggested: None
    Percent inhibition of RBD-hACE2 binding was computed using the following equation: SARS-CoV-2-specific Luminex Antibody assay: Antigen-specific IgG and IgA responses in serum samples were measured using a previously described bead-based immune-assay with some adjustments (22).
    Antigen-specific IgG
    suggested: None
    MFI values of serum samples were converted to antibody quantity (i.e. g/ml) using anti-Spike IgG and IgA antibody standards (AcroBiosystems).
    anti-Spike IgG
    suggested: None
    IgA
    suggested: None
    Next, cells were stained with an antibody cocktail (against CD3, CD10, CD19, CD21, CD27, CD38, CD40, CD69, CD71, CD95, IgD, IgG, IgM, see Table S1) for 30 mins at 4°C.
    CD3
    suggested: None
    CD10
    suggested: None
    CD19
    suggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 558063, RRID:AB_2275535)
    CD21
    suggested: (IMGENEX Cat# DDX0120, RRID:AB_1929894)
    CD27
    suggested: None
    CD38
    suggested: (Gonzalez Lab; Facultad de Química; Universidad de la República; Uruguay Cat# INQ-T10, RRID:AB_2721895)
    CD40
    suggested: None
    CD69
    suggested: None
    CD71
    suggested: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# MHCD9528TR, RRID:AB_2539765)
    CD95
    suggested: None
    IgD, IgG
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Briefly, SARS-CoV-2 recombinant proteins Spike, S1 or S2 (AcroBiosystems) were covalently conjugated to Magpix Luminex beads.
    AcroBiosystems
    suggested: (ACRObiosystems, RRID:SCR_012550)
    Analysis of flow cytometry data was performed using FlowJo software, version 10 (BD).
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)
    Statistical analyses: All statistical analyses were performed in Prism (GraphPad Software); details are provided in the figure legends.
    Prism
    suggested: (PRISM, RRID:SCR_005375)
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    There are some important limitations in our study. In addition to the small sample size, the cross-sectional nature of the study did not allow to precisely evaluate the modification of Spike-specific T cell frequency induced by the second dose at individual level. Furthermore, the analysis of both humoral and cellular immunity was performed at different time points after vaccination. Even though we showed that the level of Spike-specific T cells was minimally reduced within the first 6 months after vaccination and did not appear to influence the different pattern of Spike-specific T cells, an analysis at identical time points after boosting is indicated to demonstrate the enhanced immunogenicity of heterologous vaccination and its durability over time. Finally, the limited quantity of PBMCs collected only allowed us to perform a simple ELISpot analysis of the T cell response, a method that cannot discriminate whether the Spike-specific T cells induced by different vaccination regimens are CD4 or CD8 T cells. Such information would be needed to better characterize the possible further qualitative differences in T cells responses induced by the different vaccination regimens. In conclusion, while the Ad26.COV2.S vaccine has been initially proposed as a single dose vaccine, the progressive reduction of its protective efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection over time have warranted a better definition of the best boosting strategy (12). Here we provide data that demonstrate the enh...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.