GM-CSF Neutralization With Lenzilumab in Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.08.20125369: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Consent: Informed consent and Institutional review board approval was obtained for each patient.
IRB: Informed consent and Institutional review board approval was obtained for each patient.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Our report has several limitations. First, the …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.08.20125369: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Consent: Informed consent and Institutional review board approval was obtained for each patient.
IRB: Informed consent and Institutional review board approval was obtained for each patient.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Our report has several limitations. First, the sample size is small and did not include controls. Second, as lenzilumab was offered under emergency single-use IND conditions, all management decisions, including prescribing medications and laboratory/radiologic monitoring, were at the discretion of the treating clinicians. This resulted in some heterogeneity in the treatment specifics of individual patients as well as the laboratory and other diagnostic data that were collected. Given this and the absence of a control arm in the study, we cannot, with full confidence, declare that the clinical improvement that we noted in our patients was clearly and solely attributable to lenzilumab. These limitations will be addressed in the recently initiated randomized Phase III clinical trial (NCT04314843). In summary, we administered lenzilumab, under a single-use emergency IND compassionate program, to 12 patients with severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia and with risk factors for disease progression. Lenzilumab use was associated with improved clinical outcomes, oxygen requirement, and cytokine storm in this cohort of patients, with no reported mortality. Lenzilumab was well tolerated; no treatment-emergent adverse events attributable to lenzilumab were observed.
Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:
Identifier Status Title NCT04314843 Recruiting Study of Lenzilumab and Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Participa… NCT04351152 Recruiting Phase 3 Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Lenzilumab … Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.08.20125369: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Informed consent and Institutional review board approval was obtained for each patient. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources With this rationale, we used lenzilumab, an anti-human GM-CSF monoclonal antibody, to treat patients with severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia. anti-human GM-CSFsuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not find a statement about open data. We also did not find a statement about open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when …
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.08.20125369: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Informed consent and Institutional review board approval was obtained for each patient. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources With this rationale, we used lenzilumab, an anti-human GM-CSF monoclonal antibody, to treat patients with severe and critical COVID-19 pneumonia. anti-human GM-CSFsuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not find a statement about open data. We also did not find a statement about open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
About SciScore
SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore is not a substitute for expert review. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers) in the manuscript, and detects sentences that appear to be missing RRIDs. SciScore also checks to make sure that rigor criteria are addressed by authors. It does this by detecting sentences that discuss criteria such as blinding or power analysis. SciScore does not guarantee that the rigor criteria that it detects are appropriate for the particular study. Instead it assists authors, editors, and reviewers by drawing attention to sections of the manuscript that contain or should contain various rigor criteria and key resources. For details on the results shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.
-
-