Nanotraps for the containment and clearance of SARS-CoV-2

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.01.428871: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIACUC: The animal study protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of University of Chicago.
    IRB: This study was deemed exempt by the University of Chicago Institutional Review Board (IRB19-1942)
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableTo evaluate the safety of the Nanotraps, 2 male and 2 female 6-10-week-old C57BL/6NHsd mice were intratracheally administered with 10 mg/kg Nanotrap-ACE2 in 50 μL PBS.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    The pellet was resuspended in 100 μL PBS and incubated with biotinylated ACE2 (Bioss Antibodies) for 30 minutes on ice.
    ACE2
    suggested: None
    AF488-labeled anti-ACE2 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was added to the Nanotrap-ACE2 for 30 minutes on ice and centrifuged at 5,000×g for 10 min, the pellet was washed with PBS for 3 times.
    AF488-labeled
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    The differentiated THP-1 cells were harvested as dTHP-1 macrophages and maintained in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin.
    THP-1
    suggested: None
    After 24 hours, 3×107 FFU VSVdG*G-GFP virus was added to the HEK293T cells and incubated for another 48 hours.
    HEK293T
    suggested: None
    Coculture was carried out in a macrophage to A549 cell ratio of 1:5. 4×104 A549 cells were seeded in an 18-well microslide (Vivid) overnight and 8×103 dTHP-1 macrophages were added onto the A549 cells for another 6 hours.
    A549
    suggested: None
    In vitro cytotoxicity assay: A549 or HEK293T-ACE2 cells (both maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin) were seed in a 96-well plate at a density of 1×104 cells/well in 100 μL of culture medium overnight.
    HEK293T-ACE2
    suggested: None
    African green monkey kidney (Vero E6) cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin.
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    To evaluate the safety of the Nanotraps, 2 male and 2 female 6-10-week-old C57BL/6NHsd mice were intratracheally administered with 10 mg/kg Nanotrap-ACE2 in 50 μL PBS.
    C57BL/6NHsd
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Line scans were performed in Fiji.
    Fiji
    suggested: (Fiji, RRID:SCR_002285)
    The data were further analyzed by FlowJo (BD) and Prism (Graphpad) softwares.
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)
    Graphpad
    suggested: (GraphPad, RRID:SCR_000306)
    Image reconstruction videos were made in Imaris (Bitplane).
    Imaris
    suggested: (Imaris, RRID:SCR_007370)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We found bar graphs of continuous data. We recommend replacing bar graphs with more informative graphics, as many different datasets can lead to the same bar graph. The actual data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. For more information, please see Weissgerber et al (2015).


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.