Predictors of uncertainty and unwillingness to receive the COVID-19 booster vaccine: An observational study of 22,139 fully vaccinated adults in the UK
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.17.21267941: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: The study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee [12467/005] and all participants gave informed consent.
Consent: The study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee [12467/005] and all participants gave informed consent.Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization The study is not random and therefore is not representative of the UK population. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis A total of 32,096 participants met the first criterion, and of these, 26,619 also had data on initial COVID-19 vaccine intent, and 25,821 also met the third criterion of having had at least two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine at follow-up. 3,682 individuals were excluded due to missing … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.12.17.21267941: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: The study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee [12467/005] and all participants gave informed consent.
Consent: The study was approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee [12467/005] and all participants gave informed consent.Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization The study is not random and therefore is not representative of the UK population. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis A total of 32,096 participants met the first criterion, and of these, 26,619 also had data on initial COVID-19 vaccine intent, and 25,821 also met the third criterion of having had at least two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine at follow-up. 3,682 individuals were excluded due to missing data on other study variables, for example those who had selected “other/prefer not to say” in response to gender or “prefer not to say” on ethnicity or income, due to insufficient statistical power and an inability to create statistical weights for these individuals, leaving a total analytical sample of 22,139. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-