Accessioning and automation compatible anterior nares swab design
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.09.24.20200386: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: All experiments in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Harvard Faculty of Medicine, IRB20-0581, and informed written consent was obtained from volunteers.
Consent: All experiments in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Harvard Faculty of Medicine, IRB20-0581, and informed written consent was obtained from volunteers.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The NP swabs are remnant samples obtained through BocaBiolistics and partner labs that were de-identified by … SciScore for 10.1101/2020.09.24.20200386: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IRB: All experiments in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Harvard Faculty of Medicine, IRB20-0581, and informed written consent was obtained from volunteers.
Consent: All experiments in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Harvard Faculty of Medicine, IRB20-0581, and informed written consent was obtained from volunteers.Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The NP swabs are remnant samples obtained through BocaBiolistics and partner labs that were de-identified by BiocaBiolistics with their IRB reviewed and approved SOP for de-linking specimens. BiocaBiolisticssuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We found bar graphs of continuous data. We recommend replacing bar graphs with more informative graphics, as many different datasets can lead to the same bar graph. The actual data may suggest different conclusions from the summary statistics. For more information, please see Weissgerber et al (2015).
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.09.24.20200386: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement All experiments in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Harvard Faculty of Medicine, IRB20-0581, and informed written consent was obtained from volunteers. RT-qPCR. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The NP swabs are remnant samples obtained through BocaBiolistics and partner labs that were de-identified by BiocaBiolistics with their IRB reviewed and approved SOP for de-linking specimens. BiocaBiolisticssuggested: None…SciScore for 10.1101/2020.09.24.20200386: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement All experiments in this study were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Harvard Faculty of Medicine, IRB20-0581, and informed written consent was obtained from volunteers. RT-qPCR. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The NP swabs are remnant samples obtained through BocaBiolistics and partner labs that were de-identified by BiocaBiolistics with their IRB reviewed and approved SOP for de-linking specimens. BiocaBiolisticssuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
About SciScore
SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.
-
