Unveiling mutation effects on the structural dynamics of the main protease from SARS-CoV-2 with hybrid simulation methods
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.17.452787: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The characterization of the protein structural dynamics was done with the following analyses: a) flexibility with the Root Mean Square Fluctuation (RMSF); b) analysis of collective modes of wild-type and mutants (correspondence/correlation calculation); c) conformational sampling using hybrid methods; d) distance analysis between the two residues of the catalytic dyad; e) SASA analysis for different regions; f) analysis of the frequency of occurrence of mutants in the patient data deposited in the GISAID database. 2.1. GISAIDsuggested: (GISAID, RRID:SCR_018279)Wild-type and apo crystal … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.17.452787: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources The characterization of the protein structural dynamics was done with the following analyses: a) flexibility with the Root Mean Square Fluctuation (RMSF); b) analysis of collective modes of wild-type and mutants (correspondence/correlation calculation); c) conformational sampling using hybrid methods; d) distance analysis between the two residues of the catalytic dyad; e) SASA analysis for different regions; f) analysis of the frequency of occurrence of mutants in the patient data deposited in the GISAID database. 2.1. GISAIDsuggested: (GISAID, RRID:SCR_018279)Wild-type and apo crystal SARS-CoV-2 Mpro structures with 1.91 Å resolution (PDB ID: 7C2Y [DOI: 10.2210/pdb7C2Y/pdb]) were used to generate 48 mutants with single point mutations [17]using PyMOL software [The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.0 Schrödinger, LLC]. PyMOLsuggested: (PyMOL, RRID:SCR_000305)The normal modes were calculated using the DIMB (Iterative Mixed-Basis Diagonalization) module [24] implemented in CHARMM software [25, 26] considering all the atoms of the protein and a force field corresponding to the CHARMM36m [27]. CHARMMsuggested: (CHARMM, RRID:SCR_014892)The Heatmap, Violin and Boxplot representations were generated in Python using the Pandas [34, 35], NumPy [36], Matplotlib [37] and Seaborn [38] libraries. Pythonsuggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)NumPysuggested: (NumPy, RRID:SCR_008633)Matplotlibsuggested: (MatPlotLib, RRID:SCR_008624)Using the PISA web server, we calculate the solvation free energy gain upon formation of the interface, interface area and number of potential hydrogen bonds and salt bridge [39]. PISAsuggested: (PISA, RRID:SCR_015749)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-