Highly sensitive and specific detection of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant by double-mismatch allele-specific real time reverse transcription PCR

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.10.08.21264472: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: Clinical samples: Anonymised, residual nose and throat swab samples in virus transport medium were obtained from staff and students at Imperial College London, and from household contacts of individuals with COVID-19 (Research Ethics Committee reference
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Cell cultured virus samples: Purified SARS-CoV-2 RNA extracted from Vero cell supernatants (2 passages) was kindly provided by Professor Wendy Barclay, Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London.
    Vero
    suggested: CLS Cat# 605372/p622_VERO, RRID:CVCL_0059)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Alignments of SARS-CoV-2 VOC spike gene sequences downloaded from the GISAID database (https://www.gisaid.org/) were performed using MEGA version 7.0.21.
    MEGA
    suggested: (Mega BLAST, RRID:SCR_011920)
    The primers (Table 1) were checked by in silico PCR (https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgPcr) to rule out unwanted reactivity with the human genome, and by NCBI BLASTn (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cg) to exclude reactivity with other respiratory viruses including human coronaviruses 229E, OC43 and NL63.
    https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgPcr
    suggested: (In-Silico PCR, RRID:SCR_003089)
    BLASTn
    suggested: (BLASTN, RRID:SCR_001598)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Resource limitations mean that even in countries where genome sequencing is available it can only be used on a relatively small proportion of positive samples. DMAS-RT-PCR could provide a comparatively inexpensive, simple, rapid, highly sensitive and specific non-commercial alternative to sequencing for epidemiological surveillance of the Delta variant in many settings. An additional advantage of the DMAS-RT-PCR assay is that it appears to be capable of genotyping SARS-CoV-2 when the level of virus in clinical samples is too low for successful sequencing. Counter-intuitively, in countries such as the UK where the Delta variant is already dominant, one might consider using DMAS-RT-PCR for rapidly identifying the small minority of non-Delta cases and subjecting these to genome sequencing in order to increase the chance discovering novel, emergent non-Delta variants. In conclusion, the DMAS-RT-PCR assay that we describe here would be simple to establish in any laboratory that has the ability to conduct PCR assays and should greatly facilitate monitoring of the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant globally.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.