Identification and differential usage of a host metalloproteinase entry pathway by SARS-CoV-2 Delta and Omicron

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.02.19.481107: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    The monoclonal antibodies SARS-CoV-1/SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein S2 (1A9) and SARS-CoV-1/SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid (6H3) were purchased from ThermoFisher Scientific.
    SARS-CoV-1/SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid ( 6H3 )
    suggested: None
    The rabbit polyclonal Anti-GAPDH antibody were purchased from Abcam.
    Anti-GAPDH
    suggested: None
    The rabbit polyclonal Anti-HIV-1 p24 antibody was purchased from MilliporeSigma.
    Anti-HIV-1
    suggested: None
    The mouse anti-N protein antibody (clone 1C7) was purchased from Bioss Antibodies, and the rabbit anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (clone 007) antibody, was purchased from Sino Biological.
    anti-N protein
    suggested: None
    protein primary antibody and an anti-mouse IgG HRP secondary antibody in conjunction with SIGMAFAST™ OPD developing solution
    anti-mouse IgG
    suggested: None
    In parallel and after blocking, the second plate was incubated for one hour with a primary antibody solution formulated in PBS + 1% non-fat milk containing both mouse anti-N protein (1 μg/mL, clone 1C7) and rabbit anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (1:500 dilution, clone 007) antibodies.
    anti-N protein ( 1
    suggested: None
    anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
    suggested: None
    donkey anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor Plus 594 (2 μg/mL, Invitrogen) antibodies and DAPI (1:1000, Millipore Sigma) in PBS + 0.5% BSA consisting of.
    anti-rabbit IgG
    suggested: (Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A48284, RRID:AB_2896348)
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Cell lines, inhibitors, and antibodies: HEK293T (ATCC), HEK293T-ACE2 (kind gift of Hyeryun Choe, Scripps Research), HT1080 cells (ATCC) and Calu3 (ATCC) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Minimum Essential Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Sigma), 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, and 0.3 mg/mL L-glutamine.
    Calu3
    suggested: None
    Fusion assays: For the syncytium formation assay HEK293T and HEK293T-Ace2 cells were seeded in 24-well plates and grown to approximately 80% confluency.
    HEK293T-Ace2
    suggested: None
    Cell-cell fusion assay with soluble ACE2, effector HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with plasmid DNA encoding mCherry, and SARS-CoV2 spike and target HEK293T cells were transiently transfected with plasmid DNA encoding LTR-GFP, TMPRSS2 or pCAGGS.
    HEK293T
    suggested: KCB Cat# KCB 200744YJ, RRID:CVCL_0063)
    Gelatin zymography: HEK293T, HEK293T-ACE2, Calu3 and HT1080 cells were analyzed for MMP2 and MMP9 activity through zymographic analysis.
    HT1080
    suggested: CLS Cat# 300216/p517_HT-1080, RRID:CVCL_0317)
    HT1080-ACE2 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with penicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL), HEPES, L-Glutamine (0.3 mg/mL), 10% FBS (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific) and puromycin (1 μg/mL, InvivoGen).
    HT1080-ACE2
    suggested: None
    Twenty-four hours before infection, 2.5×104 HT1080 ACE2 cells were seeded per well of duplicate 96 well plates in puromycin-deficient DMEM and cultured overnight (37°C/5% CO2) for cell monolayer to adhere.
    HT1080 ACE2
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    HT1080 cells stably expressing ACE2 were generated by infection with lentiviral particles generated with psPAX2, pMDG and pLENTI_hACE2_PURO (gift from Raffaele De Francesco
    psPAX2
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_12260)
    pMDG
    suggested: None
    pLENTI_hACE2_PURO
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_155295)
    The full gene, untagged or with a N-terminal FLAG tag, was reconstituted by Gibson assembly, amplified by PCR, and cloned in pCAGGS.
    pCAGGS
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_127347)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Time-course imaging of the syncytia formation was performed using an Incucyte-Zoom (EssenBioscience), and images were analyzed in imageJ to measure the percentage of green surface area over background.
    imageJ
    suggested: (ImageJ, RRID:SCR_003070)
    Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 9.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.