Inflammatory responses in the placenta upon SARS-CoV-2 infection late in pregnancy

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.01.446676: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablePlacental Samples: Placental tissues from SARS-CoV-2 positive women and controls were obtained at delivery at Weill Cornell-NY Presbyterian by the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Vero E6 and A549 (adenocarcinomic human alveolar basal epithelial cell line)-ACE2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2.
    A549
    suggested: None
    cells
    suggested: None
    SARS-CoV-2 was propagated in Vero E6 cells in DMEM supplemented with 2% FBS, 4.5 g/L D-glucose, 4 mM L-glutamine, 10 mM Non-essential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 10 mM HEPES using a passage-2 stock of virus.
    Vero E6
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_XD71)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    (https://www.atcc.org/).
    https://www.atcc.org/
    suggested: (ATCC, RRID:SCR_001672)
    SARS-CoV-2-N Forward 5’ CTCTTGTAGATCTGTTCTCTAAACGAAC 3’ Reverse 5’ GGTCCACCAAACGTAATGCG 3’ GAPDH Forward 5’ CATCACCATCTTCCAGGAGCGAGAT 3’ Reverse 5’ GAGGCATTGCTGATGATCTTGAGGC 3’ qRT-PCR graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism software.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    Clusters were washed once in MACS buffer, examined for viability with Trypan Blue (GIBCO) and plated onto Matrigel-coated 96-well dishes and μ-slide 8-well chamber slides (ibidi GmbH, Germany) at confluent density in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin/ fungizone, and were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 hours prior to infection with pseudovirus to allow for attachment, For infection with SARS-CoV-2, Sections of fresh chorionic villi (2g) were minced with sterile scalpels, digested in Accutase (Innovative Cell Technologies) for 7 min or isolated using a human umbilical cord dissociation kit (Millitenyi Biotec 130-105-737), and filtrated through a 100 μm cell strainer (Falcon) to obtain cell clusters of ∼50-100 cells.
    Millitenyi Biotec
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.