Screening of SARS-CoV-2 among homeless people, asylum-seekers and other people living in precarious conditions in Marseille, France, March–April 2020

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.05.05.20091934: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: Ethics: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee of our institute (2020-015).
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableShelters A and B are for men only while shelter C is for women only.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical analysis: Statistical procedures were performed using STATA 11.1 software (StataCorp LLC, USA).
    STATA
    suggested: (Stata, RRID:SCR_012763)
    StataCorp
    suggested: (Stata, RRID:SCR_012763)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    This work has some limitations. Our study population was not randomly and homogenously recruited. Participants’ medical histories and use of individual preventive measures were not documented. Individuals were not asked about anosmia and ageusia. Notwithstanding these limitations, our data provide a novel insight into the epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 among different vulnerable urban populations. The survey also reveals the role of collective housing in relation to viral transmission within accommodation centres. Further genomic investigations are needed to better assess the source(s) and mode(s) of transmission of COVID-19 in this context.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.