Temporal changes in mental response and prevention patterns, and their impact from uncertainty stress during the transition in China from the COVID-19 epidemic to sporadic infection
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.18.21259062: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Data analysis: All data were entered into a database using Microsoft Excel. Microsoft Excelsuggested: (Microsoft Excel, RRID:SCR_016137)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:There are several limitations to this study. First, our sample size was small. Nevertheless, this is a prospective longitudinal panel study, and the variables included were repeatedly …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.18.21259062: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Data analysis: All data were entered into a database using Microsoft Excel. Microsoft Excelsuggested: (Microsoft Excel, RRID:SCR_016137)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:There are several limitations to this study. First, our sample size was small. Nevertheless, this is a prospective longitudinal panel study, and the variables included were repeatedly measured for each participant. Statistical power for the tests used in this study was high, so the sample size was large enough to make appropriate inferences. Second, sample attrition may introduce “cluster” bias because many longitudinal studies likely over-represent some of these characteristics, such as high educational attainment. A more sophisticated design and representative sample would be necessary to resolve this problem. Third, high non-response rate (39.2%) occurred in the second stage follow up. This could, in part, be due to the long period of time from the first stage to the second stage. But, demographic characteristic comparisons between the first and second stage samples(Peng et al., 2021). Further studies are necessary to reduce the bias. As the virus spreads around the globe, COVID-19 is still in epidemic status in many countries, while it moves from epidemic to sporadic infection status in other countries. This study provides new information on changing trends of mental responses and prevention patterns from the COVID-19 epidemic phase to the sporadic infection period. The study may have important implications for policy and disease prevention for many countries of the world.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
