Socioeconomic factors analysis for COVID-19 US reopening sentiment with Twitter and census data

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.30.20143727: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Limitations: Despite timely contribution to the literature, this study has some limitations. First, using tweeter data does not represent the complete section of the population. Very few people use Tweeter [67–69]. Thus, the study using Twitter data unable to provide a general idea about the subject matter. Second, sentiment analysis is unable to pick up nuanced or ambiguous meanings (e.g., slang, misspellings, nuanced or ambiguous meanings, Twitter lexicon, inside references, current events, intention, mood) of the tweets which give misleading information [67, 69]. Third, it is very difficult to analyze and identify valuable information from a very large quantity of unstructured and heterogeneous data from social media to acquire useful information for decision making [70]. Fourth, socioeconomic and household information is averaged at the state level which provides a little variation. Thus, a study with fine geographic resolutions (e.g., county, zip code etc.) might provide more insights. 5.3. Future research and conclusion: This research uses a novel methodological variation by combining sentiment analytics from Twitter data, with a custom selection of socioeconomic variables from Census data, to create insights that can contribute to developing a clearer understanding of the factors driving post-COVID-19 reopening sentiment. Sentiment and human behavior can be affected by a wide range of factors, including the information propagation formats, and future research could the...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.