Estimates of global SARS-CoV-2 infection exposure, infection morbidity, and infection mortality rates in 2020

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.24.21250396: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Mathematical modeling analyses were conducted in MATLAB R2019a (Boston/MA/USA) [34].
    MATLAB
    suggested: (MATLAB, RRID:SCR_001622)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    This study has limitations. In essence, it was based on age-stratified infection morbidity and mortality rates and the infection detection rate, estimated for a well-characterized and thoroughly investigated national epidemic, in which about half the population has already been infected [8-12, 15-21]. While the epidemic of Qatar is perhaps the world’s most advanced SARS-CoV-2 epidemic [8-12, 15-21], the extent to which fundamental infection metrics estimated with precision for one country, even if they are primarily determined by the basic biology of this infection, can be extrapolated to other countries, remains unknown. It is reasonable that these metrics could be affected by myriad factors, such as clinical or biological variations in human populations and circulating viral strains, the nature of COVID-19 responses, coverage of SARS-CoV-2 testing, and quality of reporting of cases and deaths. For instance, infection exposure is likely overestimated for countries with higher testing coverage and underestimated for countries with lower coverage. However, to make these estimates as realistic as possible, we used two independent methods with different input data to estimate infection exposure, to minimize the effect of any potential bias in either method or its data input. We also adjusted estimates for variation in healthcare access and quality by utilizing the Global Burden of Disease study’s Healthcare Access and Quality Index for each country [28]. Still, the provided esti...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.