Coping under stress: Prefrontal control predicts stress burden during the COVID-19 crisis

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.28.21259570: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Heidelberg, Germany, written informed consent from all participants was obtained, and participants were financially compensated.
    Consent: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Heidelberg, Germany, written informed consent from all participants was obtained, and participants were financially compensated.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    RandomizationThe task consisted of a randomized block design, in which every block started with a jittered 3s presentation of the instruction form (i.e. ‘Look’ or ‘Reappraise’).
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    2.6 Functional MRI data analyses and statistical analyses: Statistical parametric mapping version 12 (SPM12) implemented in MATLAB R2017b was used to analyze functional MRI data.
    Statistical parametric mapping
    suggested: (Spatial Statistical Parametric Mapping, RRID:SCR_002592)
    MATLAB
    suggested: (MATLAB, RRID:SCR_001622)
    PickAtlas v2.4(Maldjian, Laurienti
    PickAtlas
    suggested: (WFU PickAtlas, RRID:SCR_007378)
    Mean contrast values of each participant were extracted from the FWE-corrected significant clusters in the contrasts of interest (Table 1) and exported to SPSS Statistics 25.
    SPSS
    suggested: (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Some limitations of our findings need to be addressed. Only a third of our initial sample was able to take part in all COVID-19 assessments. Moreover, despite the quick start, we were unable to include the first days of the lockdown, which might have exerted the greatest effects on perceived stress. However, since we were particularly interested in coping with stress burden caused by the crisis, this time period appears to be appropriate to capture stress burden given that previous studies found no differences when comparing well-being, anxiety and depression in the initial phase of the pandemic to four weeks later (Vindegaard & Benros, 2020). In the framework of an ongoing longitudinal study following at-risk participants since birth, we thus provide first evidence for the predictive value of neural underpinnings of emotion regulation during the first and second lockdown and cognitive regulation during the COVID-19 pandemic between both waves. These findings may inform future prevention strategies seeking to foster stress coping in unforeseen situations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.