Existing human mobility data sources poorly predicted the spatial spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Madagascar

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.30.21261392: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Mechanistic model: We developed a stochastic discrete time SEIR metapopulation model for the 22 regions in Madagascar.
    Madagascar
    suggested: (Madagascar, RRID:SCR_003274)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code and data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    There are a number of caveats associated with this work. In particular, by focussing simply on region population size and connectivity patterns, the model simplifies a number of aspects that may be important to the pace of spread of SARS-CoV-2, such as within region dynamics (i.e., some regions may be more internally connected than others (Rice et al., 2021)), as well as interventions including travel bans and how these changed connectivity over the first months of spread. However, the better performance of the mobile phone model compared to the gravity-based model in both the mechanistic and statistical model suggests that the connectivity matrix used to link the regions is the core of the problem. Our analysis provides a first step for moving towards models that can capture the spread of an emergent pathogen. It also highlights the centrality of data availability and strengthening collaboration among different institutions with access to critical data - models are only as good as the data that they use - so building towards effective data-sharing pipelines is essential.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.