Assessing the Effect of Global Travel and Contact Restrictions on Mitigating the COVID-19 Pandemic

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.17.20133843: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code and data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Several limitations in our study should be noted. First, the Google/Baidu data is limited to smartphone users who have opted into relevant product features. These data may not be representative of the population as a whole, and their representativeness may vary by location. Importantly, these limited data are subject to differential privacy algorithms, designed to protect user anonymity and obscure fine detail. Moreover, comparisons across rather than within locations can only be descriptive since regions differ in substantial ways. Second, the accuracy of our model relies on accurate estimates of Re and other epidemiological parameters derived from reported case data. The quality of reported data and epidemiologic features of COVID-19 likely differs across countries/regions (33–35), due to varying case definitions, diagnosis and surveillance capacity, population demographics, and other factors (36). Third, we assumed the observed travel and contact reductions have similar effects in minimizing exposure risk of COVID-19 across space and time. The impact of physical distancing might, however, vary between urban and suburban or rural areas with different population densities. Fourth, many other factors may also contribute to COVID-19 spread or mitigation. For example, our simulations did not specify the contributions of pre-symptomatic transmission, presence of other NPIs such as using face masks (37), or the potential continuous importations of the virus via international trav...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.