Implementation of a pooled surveillance testing program for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections in K-12 schools and universities

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.02.09.21251464: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: Written informed consent for Covid-19 testing was obtained from each participant from all institutions prior to the start of the surveillance program.
    IRB: The SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviewed and approved the study protocol (IRB #1232938-3).
    Field Sample Permit: The specimen collection was performed under supervision of a trained representative from each organization.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical Methods: Statistical analyses were performed in RStudio v1.3.959 (http://www.rstudio.com/), using R v4.0.2 (https://www.r-project.org/) and data visualization was performed by R package ggplot2 and ggpubr (https://rpkgs.datanovia.com/ggpubr)13,14.
    RStudio
    suggested: (RStudio, RRID:SCR_000432)
    https://www.r-project.org/
    suggested: (R Project for Statistical Computing, RRID:SCR_001905)
    ggplot2
    suggested: (ggplot2, RRID:SCR_014601)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    One limitation of this study is that the applicability of the methodology described here requires both technical and logistical methods that are not reproducible in every lab. However, concepts of pooling, strategies around reducing costs for schools, and the unique value of providing testing for schools as it relates to community viral spread described here, remain broadly applicable to the K-12 testing strategies that are required around the country. Additional limitations include the need for lab-based testing as in theory this concept can be broadly applied to point of care concepts as well. However, as with any testing strategy, scalability is important. The ability to rapidly scale SalivaClear™ using existing lab infrastructure makes it broadly appealing to labs seeking to increase testing capacity and efficiency. While the non-standardized methods of school openings across the country are a limiting factor when evaluating the data for the exact role SalivaClear™ played for each school, it is important to highlight that all schools utilizing this method were able to remain open. In order to provide enough testing capacity to safely open schools and provide testing for at-risk communities, pooled concepts must be further evaluated and considered. As vaccination against COVID-19 may remain unavailable for children under 16 years of age for months to come, pooled testing must be considered a fundamental component to the safe reopening of schools while minimizing transmissi...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a protocol registration statement.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.