The BNT162b2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine induces transient afucosylated IgG1 in naive but not in antigen-experienced vaccinees

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.02.14.480353: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: Participants were included through informed consent.
    IRB: The ethics committee of the AUMC approved the study.
    IACUC: Blood samples were collected after obtaining written informed consent under the local ethics board–approved protocols 19-019(A) and 20-123 (Ethics Committee of the University of Lübeck, Germany).
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    RandomizationNo other selection criteria were used and participants were selected at random.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Anti-Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) and anti-Nucleocapsid (N) antibody levels were measured as by an RBD and N-based bridging assay, respectively, as described previously (50, 51).
    anti-Nucleocapsid ( N
    suggested: None
    IL-6 levels in the supernatant were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using IL-6 CT205-c and CT205-d antibody pair (U-CyTech, Utrecht, the Netherlands) as described previously (1).
    CT205-d
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Flow Cytometry Standard (FCS) 3.0 files were analyzed with FlowJo software version X 0.7 (BD Biosciences).
    FlowJo
    suggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)
    Other statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism v6.0 (
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)
    (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA).
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    A second limitation of our study is the uneven sample size for naive and antigen-experienced vaccine recipients after the first and second dose of BNT162b2. This is largely due to lack of an accessible, high-throughput serological assay to measure antigen-specific IgG glycosylation to study both transient and stable glycosylation features in disease settings. In summary, our data demonstrate a qualitatively and quantitatively distinct IgG immune response between BNT162b2 mRNA vaccinated SARS-CoV-2 naive and antigen-experienced individuals. Transient afucosylated IgG1 responses were induced in naive individuals upon the first dose, which correlated with increased titer after the second vaccination. In contrast, antigen-experienced vaccinees had low levels of afucosylated anti-S, which slightly increased upon vaccination. The qualitatively distinct IgG1 glycosylation patterns might further mediate differences in protection between these two groups. Future efforts focused on inducing and studying antigen-specific, afucosylated IgG1 responses are needed to investigate their protective capacity and inflammatory potential in anti-viral and vaccine-induced immunity.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on pages 52, 13 and 54. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.